Which one of the following statements explains correctlv the law of frustration?

Related MCQs

• Consider the following statements: 1. There is no difference between the English law and Indian law with regard to acceptance through post. 2. Both under the English law and the Indian law a contract is concluded when the letter of acceptance is posted 3. Under the Indian law when the letter of acceptance is posted it is complete only as against the proposer. 4. It is complete only as against the proposer. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
• The doctrine of frustration is covered by which section of the Indian Contract Act?
• The first case on the 'doctrine of frustration' as decided by the Supreme Court of India is
• Consider the following statements: Consideration is 1. A motive for any promise 2. A price for any promise 3. Only a moral obligation 4. Something of value in the eye of law Of these statements
• Consider the following statements: 1. General offer require the communication of acceptance. 2. All contracts are agreements 3. All agreements are contracts 4. All illegal agreements are void agreements Which of the statements given above are correct?
• Which one of the following statements about a valid acceptance of an offer is NOT correct?
• Which one of the following statements is true?
• Which one of the following statements is incorrect with regard to nature of a valid consideration?
• Which one of the following statements about the doctrine of privity is correct?
• With regard to the contractual capacity of a person of unsound mind, which one of the following statements is most appropriate?