[Solved] The attestation clause of X’s will do not contain his signature. At its probate, it is being opposed on that basis. Is the opposition correct? Choose the best answer.

Q.	The attestation clause of X’s will do not contain his signature. At its probate, it is being opposed on that basis. Is the opposition correct? Choose the best answer.
A.	Yes, because it is fatal defect.
B.	Yes, the will is not valid.
C.	No, attestation clause is not an act of the testator.
D.	No, attestation clause is not a part of a will.
Answer» C. No, attestation clause is not an act of the testator.

1.2k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Mr. Tiok Chua executed a last will and testament. X, a niece was charged with the crime of forgery alleging that she forged Mr. Chua’s signature. In the meantime, the will was admitted to probate. State the effect of the admission of the will to probate.
A executed a will consisting of ten pages. At the probate, B, one of his children interposed an opposition on the ground that one of the pages of the same has not been signed by A and one of the witnesses. Rule on the opposition.
The attestation in the will of A omitted to state that the testator signed the pages of the will in the presence of the instrumental witnesses. Can evidence aliunde be admitted to prove such fact in the probate proceeding?
A and B are married. They have children X, Y and Z. Before his death, A donated a parcel of land to X denominated as an irrevocable donation. He died leaving a will but did not institute X. When the will was submitted to probate, X opposed on the ground of preterition. Is X correct?
X executed a holographic will dated December 2000. After his death, A and B, the heirs filed a petition for probate, but C, the daughter opposed on the ground that the will is not valid because it is not completely dated.
Spouses M and N executed two (2) separate wills containing the same provisions. After their death, their compulsory heirs filed a petition for joint probate of their wills. One of the voluntary heirs objected because joint probate is invalid. Is the objection tenable?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by a TCT No. 1. B stole the title, forged his signature and transferred it under his name. TCT No. 2 was issued under his name. He sold it to C who registered under his name. When returned to the Philippine in 2010, he discovered that his title was transferred to another. Can he recover the same?
X executed a will instituting his heirs. It was discovered 15 years after his death, hence, the heirs consulted you whether they can still file a petition for its probate, considering that they have already extrajudicially settled his estate. What is your advice?
X during his lifetime sold and conveyed two (2) parcels of land to his heirs. After X’s death and the probate of his will, are the conveyed properties subject to collation for determination of the heirs’ legitime?
Samson, the son of a wealthy family has always claimed that since childhood, he was not a boy. He played with the girls and did not mingle with the boys. After finishing his course at a university in the Philippines, he went to the US to take up his masteral and doctorate degrees. He consulted several doctors of the possibility of sex transmission from that of male to that of a female. The sex transmission was done in Thailand and which was certified as successful by a medical expert in Manila, hence, he claimed to be a woman. He filed a petition for correction of entry of his record of birth from male to female and his name from Samson to Delailah as he was marrying his fiancé. The lower court granted the petition. Is the order of the court correct?