McqMate
| 101. |
In cases of Wills, the period of thirty years shall run |
| A. | from the date of the will |
| B. | from the date of the death of the testator |
| C. | from the date of registration of the will, if registered |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» A. from the date of the will | |
| 102. |
Presumption as to the genuineness of gazettes in electronic form has been dealt with under |
| A. | section 81 a of evidence act . |
| B. | section 88a of evidence act |
| C. | section 90a of evidence act |
| D. | section 73a of evidence act. |
| Answer» A. section 81 a of evidence act . | |
| 103. |
Section 91 of Evidence Act applies to |
| A. | transactions which under the law must be in writing |
| B. | transactions which are reduced into writing voluntarily |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | only (a) 8: not (b). |
| Answer» C. both (a) & (b) | |
| 104. |
Section 91 of Evidence Act applies to documents which are |
| A. | unilateral |
| B. | bilateral |
| C. | tripartite |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 105. |
Section 92 of Evidence Act prohibits admission of oral evidence, in respect of a written document, for the purpose of |
| A. | contradicting its terms |
| B. | varying its terms |
| C. | adding to its terms |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 106. |
Section 92 of Evidence Act is applicable to |
| A. | disputes between the parties to the instrument only |
| B. | disputes between a party to the instrument and a stranger |
| C. | disputes between two strangers where the document is in question |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» A. disputes between the parties to the instrument only | |
| 107. |
Section 92 of Evidence Act applies to |
| A. | unilateral documents |
| B. | bilateral documents |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» B. bilateral documents | |
| 108. |
Oral evidence of a fact invalidating the document is admissible |
| A. | under proviso 1 to section 92 of evidence act |
| B. | under proviso 2 to section 92 of evidence act |
| C. | under proviso 4 to section 92 of evidence act |
| D. | under proviso 6 to section 92 of evidence act. |
| Answer» A. under proviso 1 to section 92 of evidence act | |
| 109. |
The want or failure of consideration as contemplated under proviso 1 to section 92 of Evidence Act invalidating a document |
| A. | is a complete want or failure |
| B. | is a partial want or failure |
| C. | is a substantial want or failure |
| D. | may be complete or may be partial want or failure. |
| Answer» A. is a complete want or failure | |
| 110. |
Mistake referred to in proviso 1 to section 92 of Evidence Act refers to |
| A. | unilateral mistake |
| B. | mutual mistake |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | only (b) not (a). |
| Answer» C. both (a) & (b) | |
| 111. |
Under section 92 of Evidence Act oral evidence to explain the real nature of the transaction is admissible |
| A. | where the document does not record all the terms of the contract |
| B. | where the document records all the terms of the contract |
| C. | where the documents is complete in itself |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» A. where the document does not record all the terms of the contract | |
| 112. |
Under proviso 4 to section 92 of Evidence Act, oral evidence is admissible in cases |
| A. | where the contract has been written voluntarily & not required by laws to be so written |
| B. | where the law required the contract to be in writing |
| C. | where the contract has been registered under the law of registration of documents |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» A. where the contract has been written voluntarily & not required by laws to be so written | |
| 113. |
Extrinsic evidence to show the meaning or supply the defects in an instrument, is prohibited under section 93, in respect of |
| A. | ambiguitas patens |
| B. | ambiguitas lateens |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | only (b) & not (a). |
| Answer» A. ambiguitas patens | |
| 114. |
The test of ascertaining on which side the burden of proof lies is contained in |
| A. | section 100 of evidence act |
| B. | section 101 of evidence act |
| C. | section 102 of evidence act |
| D. | section 103 of evidence act. |
| Answer» C. section 102 of evidence act | |
| 115. |
Burden of proof |
| A. | partially determines the right to begin |
| B. | substantially determines the right to begin |
| C. | wholly determines the right to begin |
| D. | only (c) & not (a) or (b). |
| Answer» A. partially determines the right to begin | |
| 116. |
Burden of proof under section 101 of Evidence Act |
| A. | never shifts |
| B. | goes on shifting as the trial proceeds |
| C. | may shift |
| D. | both (b) & (c) are correct. |
| Answer» A. never shifts | |
| 117. |
Burden of proof is lightened by |
| A. | presumptions |
| B. | admissions |
| C. | estoppels |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 118. |
Burden of introducing evidence under section 102 of Evidence Act |
| A. | never shifts |
| B. | occasionally shifts |
| C. | constantly shifts |
| D. | only (a) and not (b) or (c). |
| Answer» C. constantly shifts | |
| 119. |
In criminal proceedings, the burden of proof is |
| A. | on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused |
| B. | on the accused to prove his innocence |
| C. | on both the parties |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» A. on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused | |
| 120. |
Section 105 of Evidence Act applies to |
| A. | criminal trials |
| B. | civil trials |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» A. criminal trials | |
| 121. |
In criminal trials, the onus is on the accused to prove that his case falls in |
| A. | any of the general exception |
| B. | any of the special exception |
| C. | any of the proviso to any provision |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 122. |
In criminal trials, the accused has to establish his plea mitigation or justification of an offence |
| A. | beyond reasonable doubt |
| B. | prima fzzcie |
| C. | substantially |
| D. | either (a) or (c). |
| Answer» B. prima fzzcie | |
| 123. |
Any person’ in section 106 of Evidence Act refers to |
| A. | a party to the suit |
| B. | a stranger to the state |
| C. | a person who is not a party to the suit but interested in the outcome of the suit |
| D. | a witness |
| Answer» A. a party to the suit | |
| 124. |
The presumption of continuance of life is contained in |
| A. | section 106 of evidence act |
| B. | section 107 of evidence act |
| C. | section 108 of evidence act |
| D. | section 109 of evidence act. |
| Answer» B. section 107 of evidence act | |
| 125. |
Section 108 of Evidence Act relates to |
| A. | presumption of death |
| B. | presumption of life |
| C. | presumption of legitimacy |
| D. | presumption of relationship. |
| Answer» A. presumption of death | |
| 126. |
For presumption under section 107 of Evidence Act, the person is to be shown to be alive |
| A. | within 7 years |
| B. | within 12 years |
| C. | within 3 years |
| D. | within 30 years. |
| Answer» D. within 30 years. | |
| 127. |
For presumption of death under section 108 of Evidence Act, the person is shown to be not heard for a period of |
| A. | 3 years |
| B. | 7 years |
| C. | 12 years |
| D. | 30 years. |
| Answer» B. 7 years | |
| 128. |
The principle that possession is prima facie proof of ownership is contained in |
| A. | section 109 of evidence act |
| B. | section 110 of evidence act |
| C. | section 111 of evidence act |
| D. | section 112 of evidence act. |
| Answer» B. section 110 of evidence act | |
| 129. |
The possession contemplated under section 110 of Evidence Act is |
| A. | juridical possession |
| B. | symbolic possession |
| C. | actual physical possession |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» C. actual physical possession | |
| 130. |
Section 110 of evidence Act in its operation |
| A. | is limited to immoveable property |
| B. | is limited to moveable property |
| C. | is not limited to immoveable property and applies to moveable property as well |
| D. | is not limited to immoveable property but applies only to certain moveable property. |
| Answer» C. is not limited to immoveable property and applies to moveable property as well | |
| 131. |
Section 112 of Evidence Act provides for |
| A. | presumption of life |
| B. | presumption of marriage |
| C. | presumption of death |
| D. | presumption of legitimacy. |
| Answer» D. presumption of legitimacy. | |
| 132. |
Section 112 of Evidence Act contains |
| A. | a presumption of fact |
| B. | a rebuttable presumption of law |
| C. | an irrebuttable presumption of law |
| D. | a mixed presumption of fact & law. |
| Answer» C. an irrebuttable presumption of law | |
| 133. |
Section 112 of Evidence Act applies when there is a dispute regarding |
| A. | maternity of a child |
| B. | paternity of a child |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» B. paternity of a child | |
| 134. |
The deciding factor under section 112 of Evidence Act is |
| A. | the date of birth of the child |
| B. | the date of conception of the child |
| C. | the date of birth or the date of conception depending on the facts & circumstances |
| D. | only (b) ¬ (a). |
| Answer» A. the date of birth of the child | |
| 135. |
Section 114 of Evidence Act provides for certain |
| A. | presumption of facts |
| B. | rebuttable presumptions of law |
| C. | irrebuttable presumptions of law |
| D. | presumption of facts & law both. |
| Answer» A. presumption of facts | |
| 136. |
An accomplice is |
| A. | not a competent witness against an accused |
| B. | a competent witness against an accused |
| C. | cannot be a competent witness against an accused |
| D. | either (a) or (c). |
| Answer» B. a competent witness against an accused | |
| 137. |
Presumption |
| A. | is an evidence |
| B. | is a proof |
| C. | shows on whom the burden of proof lies |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» C. shows on whom the burden of proof lies | |
| 138. |
Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman has been provided |
| A. | under section 111a of evidence act |
| B. | under section 113a of evidence act |
| C. | under section 113b of evidence act |
| D. | under section 113 of evidence act. |
| Answer» B. under section 113a of evidence act | |
| 139. |
Presumption under section 113A of Evidence Act can be raised if the suicide by the married woman is committed |
| A. | within 7 years of marriage |
| B. | within 5 years of marriage |
| C. | within 3 years of marriage |
| D. | within 1 year of marriage. |
| Answer» A. within 7 years of marriage | |
| 140. |
Presumption as to dowry death is contained in |
| A. | section 111a of evidence act |
| B. | section 113a of evidence act |
| C. | section 113b of evidence act |
| D. | section 113 of evidence act. |
| Answer» C. section 113b of evidence act | |
| 141. |
Presumption under section 114 of Evidence Act can be raised having regard to the common course of |
| A. | natural events |
| B. | human conduct |
| C. | public and private business |
| D. | all of the above. |
| Answer» D. all of the above. | |
| 142. |
The doctrine of estoppel is contained in |
| A. | section 115 of evidence act |
| B. | section 114 of evidence act |
| C. | section 113 of evidence act |
| D. | section 112 of evidence act. |
| Answer» A. section 115 of evidence act | |
| 143. |
The doctrine of estoppel is a |
| A. | substantive law |
| B. | rule of equity |
| C. | rule of evidence |
| D. | law of pleadings. |
| Answer» C. rule of evidence | |
| 144. |
Estoppels are binding |
| A. | upon litigating parties |
| B. | upon privies of the litigating parties |
| C. | upon strangers to the lis |
| D. | both (a) & (b) only. |
| Answer» D. both (a) & (b) only. | |
| 145. |
Estoppel is a rule of |
| A. | civil action |
| B. | criminal action |
| C. | both civil and criminal action |
| D. | only (b) and not (a). |
| Answer» A. civil action | |
| 146. |
The estoppel in section 115 of Evidence Act |
| A. | is an estoppel by record |
| B. | is an estoppel by deed |
| C. | is an estoppel by pais |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» C. is an estoppel by pais | |
| 147. |
In which of the following there is no estoppel |
| A. | on a point of law |
| B. | against a statute |
| C. | attestation of a deed |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» C. attestation of a deed | |
| 148. |
Estoppel can be |
| A. | by silence |
| B. | by negligence |
| C. | by election |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 149. |
Estoppel deals with |
| A. | question of facts |
| B. | question of right |
| C. | both (a) 8: (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» A. question of facts | |
| 150. |
Estoppel |
| A. | is a cause of action in itself |
| B. | creates a cause of action |
| C. | both (a) & (b) are correct |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b) is correct. |
| Answer» D. neither (a) nor (b) is correct. | |
| 151. |
Estoppel |
| A. | should be specifically pleaded |
| B. | need not be specifically pleaded |
| C. | may be specifically pleaded or may not be specifically pleaded |
| D. | both (b) & (c) are correct. |
| Answer» A. should be specifically pleaded | |
| 152. |
Rule of estoppel of tenants and of licence of person in possession is contained in |
| A. | section 116 of evidence act |
| B. | section 117 of evidende act |
| C. | section 118 of evidence act |
| D. | section 119 of evidence act. |
| Answer» A. section 116 of evidence act | |
| 153. |
Estoppel operates in case of a tenant |
| A. | during the continuance of tenancy |
| B. | who remain in possession after the termination of tenancy by notice to quit |
| C. | both (a) and (b) |
| D. | only (a) and not (b). |
| Answer» C. both (a) and (b) | |
| 154. |
Under section 116 of Evidence Act, the tenant is estopped |
| A. | from denying the title to the property, of the landlord |
| B. | from denying the title to the property, of the actual owner |
| C. | both\(a)&(b) |
| D. | only & not (a). |
| Answer» A. from denying the title to the property, of the landlord | |
| 155. |
A tenant or licencee under section 116 of Evidence Act is estopped from denying the title of landlord |
| A. | during the continuance of tenancy |
| B. | after the creation of tenancy or licence |
| C. | after the surrender of possession under tenancy or licence |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» A. during the continuance of tenancy | |
| 156. |
Under section 118 who amongst the following are competent witnesses |
| A. | child |
| B. | accused |
| C. | lunatic |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 157. |
A person is competent to testify |
| A. | if he understands the question put to him |
| B. | if he is able to give rational awareness to those questions |
| C. | if has both (a) & (b) |
| D. | if has (a) only and not (b). |
| Answer» C. if has both (a) & (b) | |
| 158. |
A dumb person is a competent witness as provided under |
| A. | section 118 of evidence act |
| B. | section 119 of evidence act |
| C. | section 120 of evidence act |
| D. | section 121 of evidence act. |
| Answer» B. section 119 of evidence act | |
| 159. |
Husband & wife both are competent witness for & against each other |
| A. | in civil proceedings |
| B. | in criminal proceedings |
| C. | in both civil & criminal proceedings |
| D. | neither in civil nor in criminal proceedings. |
| Answer» C. in both civil & criminal proceedings | |
| 160. |
Section 121 of Evidence Act provides for privilege in respect of |
| A. | husband & wife |
| B. | judges & magistrates |
| C. | affairs of the state |
| D. | official communication. |
| Answer» B. judges & magistrates | |
| 161. |
Privilege in respect of judges & magistrates under section 121 of Evidence Act relates to |
| A. | questions which a witness cannot be compelled to answer |
| B. | question which a witness cannot be permitted to answer |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» D. neither (a) nor (b). | |
| 162. |
Privilege under section 121 of Evidence Act is |
| A. | available to an arbitrator |
| B. | not available to an arbitrator |
| C. | may or may. not be available to an |
| D. | arbitrator both (b) & (c) are correct. |
| Answer» A. available to an arbitrator | |
| 163. |
Privilege in respect of husband & wife under section 122 of Evidence Act relates to |
| A. | question which a witness cannot be compelled to answer |
| B. | question which a witness cannot be permitted to answer |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | only (b) & not (a). |
| Answer» C. both (a) & (b) | |
| 164. |
A document containing a communication from a husband to a wife or vice versa, in the hands of a third person |
| A. | is not admissible in evidence until consented to by the writer of the communication |
| B. | is not admissible in evidence at all is not admissible in evidence until- |
| C. | is admissible in evidence |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» C. is admissible in evidence | |
| 165. |
A husband or wife are permitted to disclose any communication between them during marriage |
| A. | in civil proceedings between the parties |
| B. | in criminal proceedings between the parties |
| C. | in matrimonial proceedings between the parties |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» D. all the above. | |
| 166. |
Protection under section 122 of Evidence Act is available to |
| A. | a witness |
| B. | husband & wife as a witness |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» B. husband & wife as a witness | |
| 167. |
Protection under section 122 of Evidence Act |
| A. | can be waived by the witness without the consent of the husband or wife |
| B. | can be waived by the witness with the consent of husband or wife, only |
| C. | cannot be waived by the witness under any circumstances |
| D. | either (a) or (c). |
| Answer» A. can be waived by the witness without the consent of the husband or wife | |
| 168. |
Communication in respect of the affairs of the state are privileged communication on the grounds of public policy |
| A. | under section 123 of evidence act |
| B. | under section 124 of evidence act |
| C. | under section 125 of evidence act |
| D. | under section 126 of evidence act. |
| Answer» A. under section 123 of evidence act | |
| 169. |
Documents in respect of which privilege has been provided under section 123 of Evidence Act. |
| A. | is a published official record |
| B. | is an unpublished official record |
| C. | both (a)&(b) |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» B. is an unpublished official record | |
| 170. |
In deciding whether the document falls in the category of ‘unpublished official record’ the court |
| A. | has the jurisdiction to inspect the documents itself |
| B. | the court is banned from inspecting the document |
| C. | the court can compel the production of the document for inspection |
| D. | both (a) & (c) are correct. - |
| Answer» B. the court is banned from inspecting the document | |
| 171. |
Section 124 of Evidence Act provides for privileged in respect of |
| A. | professional communications |
| B. | official communications |
| C. | communications as to information of commission of offence |
| D. | none of the above. |
| Answer» B. official communications | |
| 172. |
For protection under section 124 of Evidence Act, the communication is to be made |
| A. | to a public officer in official confidence |
| B. | to a public officer as a routine matter |
| C. | to a public officer as an ordinary cause of his duties |
| D. | either (a) or (b) or (c). |
| Answer» A. to a public officer in official confidence | |
| 173. |
The professional privilege under section 126 of Evidence Act is available in respect of communication made |
| A. | for the purposes of professional employment |
| B. | the cause of employment |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» C. both (a) & (b) | |
| 174. |
Legal advisor |
| A. | i can disclose the communication after his clients death |
| B. | f can disclose the communication after the relation with his client has ended |
| C. | cannot disclose the communication even when the relation is ended or the client has died |
| D. | both (a) 8: (b) are correct. |
| Answer» C. cannot disclose the communication even when the relation is ended or the client has died | |
| 175. |
An accomplice is a competent witness |
| A. | under section 118 of evidence act |
| B. | under section 119 of evidence act |
| C. | under section 133 of evidence act |
| D. | under section 132 of evidence act. |
| Answer» C. under section 133 of evidence act | |
| 176. |
An accomplice is a person |
| A. | who participates in the commission of the crime for which the accused has been charged |
| B. | who is a prefended confederate |
| C. | who is an informer |
| D. | all the above both (a) 8: (b). |
| Answer» A. who participates in the commission of the crime for which the accused has been charged | |
| 177. |
Testimony of an accomplice before it is accepted &: acted upon |
| A. | must be corroborated from the testimony of another accomplice |
| B. | must be corroborated from an independent source |
| C. | need not be corroborated at all |
| D. | either (a) or (c). |
| Answer» B. must be corroborated from an independent source | |
| 178. |
Question as to admissibility of evidence |
| A. | should be decided as they arise |
| B. | should be reserved until judgment |
| C. | may be decided as they arise or may be reserved until judgment |
| D. | either (b) or (c). |
| Answer» A. should be decided as they arise | |
| 179. |
Examination in chief of a witness |
| A. | shall be by the party calling the witness |
| B. | shall be by the adverse party |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | either (a) -or (b). |
| Answer» A. shall be by the party calling the witness | |
| 180. |
Re-examination of a witness |
| A. | shall be by the party calling the witness |
| B. | shall be by the adverse party |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | either (a) or (b). |
| Answer» A. shall be by the party calling the witness | |
| 181. |
Re-examinati0n of a witness can be done |
| A. | after examination in chief but before cross-examination |
| B. | after examination chief and after cross-examination |
| C. | either (a) or (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» B. after examination chief and after cross-examination | |
| 182. |
During re-examination of a witness |
| A. | a new matter can be introduced as a matter of right generally |
| B. | a new matter can be introduced only with the permission of the court |
| C. | no new matter can be introduced at all |
| D. | either (a) or (c). |
| Answer» B. a new matter can be introduced only with the permission of the court | |
| 183. |
A co-defendant in a case |
| A. | cannot be cross-examined by another co- defendant under any circumstance |
| B. | can be cross-examined by another co-defendant if their interests are identical |
| C. | can be cross-examined by another co-defendant when their interests adverse to each other |
| D. | can be cross-examined by another co-defendant as a matter of right. |
| Answer» C. can be cross-examined by another co-defendant when their interests adverse to each other | |
| 184. |
It Cross-examination of a witness 229. Leading questions can be asked during |
| A. | examination in chief |
| B. | cross-examination |
| C. | re-examination |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» B. cross-examination | |
| 185. |
Court can permit leading questions during examination in chief or re-examination |
| A. | if they refer to the matters which are introductory |
| B. | if they refer to the matters which are undisputed |
| C. | if they refer to the matter which are sufficiently proved |
| D. | if they refer to either (a) or (b) or (c). |
| Answer» D. if they refer to either (a) or (b) or (c). | |
| 186. |
A leading question has been defined as a question suggesting the answer which the person putting it wishes or expects to receive, under |
| A. | section 140 of evidence act |
| B. | section 141 of evidence act |
| C. | section 142 of evidence act |
| D. | section 143 of evidence act. |
| Answer» B. section 141 of evidence act | |
| 187. |
Under section 145 of Evidence Act, a witness may be cross-examined as to previous statement in writing |
| A. | without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness |
| B. | only after proving the same, may be without showing the same to the witness |
| C. | without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness |
| D. | only after proving the same & showing the same to the witness. |
| Answer» A. without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness | |
| 188. |
Under section 145 of Evidence Act, a witness may be contradicted as to previous statement in writing |
| A. | without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness |
| B. | without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness |
| C. | after proving the same may be before showing the same to the witness |
| D. | after proving the same & showing the same to the witness. |
| Answer» B. without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness | |
| 189. |
Objections as to the admissibility of a document in evidence |
| A. | can be made at any state during the trial |
| B. | can be made at the first opportunity when the document is tendered in evidence |
| C. | can be raised for the first time in appeal |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» B. can be made at the first opportunity when the document is tendered in evidence | |
| 190. |
A party/person who calls the witness can be permitted to cross-examine the witness so called by him, as provided |
| A. | under section 152 of evidence act |
| B. | under section 153 of evidence act |
| C. | under section 154 of evidence act |
| D. | under section 155 of evidence act. |
| Answer» C. under section 154 of evidence act | |
| 191. |
Section 162 of Cr PC |
| A. | controls section 157 of evidence act |
| B. | controls section 156 of evidence act |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» A. controls section 157 of evidence act | |
| 192. |
Court questions can be put by virtue of |
| A. | section 164 of evidence act |
| B. | section 165 of evidence act |
| C. | section 166 of evidence act |
| D. | section 167 of evidence act. |
| Answer» B. section 165 of evidence act | |
| 193. |
Court question under section 165 of Evidence Act can be put to |
| A. | any witness |
| B. | any party |
| C. | both (a) & (b) |
| D. | neither (a) nor (b). |
| Answer» C. both (a) & (b) | |
| 194. |
To an answer to a court question, the adverse party |
| A. | has a right to cross-examination as a matter of right |
| B. | has a right to cross-examine only with the permission of the court |
| C. | has no right to cross-examine the witness |
| D. | either (a) or (c). |
| Answer» B. has a right to cross-examine only with the permission of the court | |
| 195. |
The right to cross-examine on an answer to court question is available |
| A. | to the adverse party only |
| B. | to the party calling the witness only |
| C. | to either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties |
| D. | only (a) and not (b). |
| Answer» C. to either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties | |
| 196. |
Under section 41 of Evidence Act the presumption is with respect to |
| A. | judgments in rem when they are inter- parts |
| B. | judgment in rem whether such judgments are inter-partes or not |
| C. | judgments in personam |
| D. | all the above. |
| Answer» B. judgment in rem whether such judgments are inter-partes or not | |
| 197. |
The presumption under section 41 of Evidence Act is a |
| A. | "presumption of fact |
| B. | rebuttable presumption of law |
| C. | irrebuttable presumption of law . |
| D. | presumption of fact & law. |
| Answer» C. irrebuttable presumption of law . | |
| 198. |
Delhi High Court issued guidelines for the protection of witness in |
| A. | neelam katara case (2003) |
| B. | naina sahni case (2007) |
| C. | llphaar cinema case (2005) |
| D. | parliament attack case (2006). |
| Answer» A. neelam katara case (2003) | |
| 199. |
Where there are three different dying declarations, Higher Court is |
| A. | not to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court |
| B. | to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court |
| C. | to go through the circumstantial evidence to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court |
| D. | to rely upon the versions of witnesses to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court. |
| Answer» A. not to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court | |
| 200. |
Zahira Sheikh was prime witness in |
| A. | best bakery case (2004) |
| B. | best bakery retrial case (2006) \ |
| C. | sukh ram disproportionate assets case (2005) |
| D. | gujjar killings case (2003). |
| Answer» B. best bakery retrial case (2006) \ | |
Done Reading?