I'm preparing a workshop on democratic theory for my university club and need to practically compare Rousseau's 'general will' with Mill's 'harm principle' in terms of guiding policy decisions. How do these concepts conflict or align in real-world scenarios?

I've read Rousseau's 'Social Contract' and Mill's 'On Liberty', but I'm having trouble translating their abstract ideas into actionable advice for discussions on issues like free speech or public health measures. For instance, when designing a club policy on member conduct, should I prioritize collective consensus (Rousseau) or individual freedom (Mill)? I've tried role-playing scenarios, but it's still murky.