[Solved] Which one of the following statements is true in relation to the offence of abetment?

Q.	Which one of the following statements is true in relation to the offence of abetment?
A.	It is not necessary that the offence for which abetment is alleged should have been committed
B.	Unless an offence is successfully committed, there’s no question of abetment.
C.	For the offence of the abetment to be established, the abettor should have been proved to have done something at the time of commission of the offence itself to help its commission
D.	A returns a licensed weapon belonging to B on his demand with which B commits a murder A is liable for abetment.
Answer» A. It is not necessary that the offence for which abetment is alleged should have been committed

2.6k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Abetment of any offence, punishable with death or imprisonment for life, if the offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment is dealt under-
Which one of the following statements is true in relation to the offence of abetment?
Abetment of an offence, punishable with death or imprisonment for life if an act, which causes harm to be done in consequence of the abetment is dealt under-
A, intending to cause theft instigates B, to take property belonging to Z out of Z’s possession. A induces B to believe that the property belongs to A. B takes the property out of Z’s possession in good faith, believing it to be A’s property. With reference to the above statement Assertion (A): A is guilty of abetment of theft even if B is innocent. Reason (R): Liability of abettor is not dependent on the liability of the principal accused. Directions:- the following item consist of two statements, one labeled as Assertion A and the other labeled as Reason R. You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion A and the Reason R are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answers to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
Section 34 of I.P.C. provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations: 1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A’s house. 2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang. 3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence. 4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale). Which of the situation given above reflect (s) the correct ingredients with regard of Section 34?
When a member of an unlawful assembly is to be constructively found guilty of an offence, he must commit same offence of which the principle is convicted and not some other offence this statement is --
Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment, if offence be committed if the offence be not committed is dealt under-
Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-
Abetment of an offence is
The abetment of offence is completed as soon: