[Solved] Which one of the following statements correctly describes the clauses thirdly of Section 300 IPC?

Q.	Which one of the following statements correctly describes the clauses thirdly of Section 300 IPC?
A.	Intention to cause bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death
B.	Knowledge that an act of that kind will be likely to cause death must be proved
C.	It must be shown that the accused intended to inflict the very injury that is present
D.	Nature of the injury need not be proved.
Answer» A. Intention to cause bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death

4.1k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Section 300 of the IPC speaks of situations in which if a murder is committed, then it is treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Which one of the following situations is not covered under S. 300, IPC?
Assertion (A): Where sister of X was being abducted by force from her parents house by her husband, X caused death of sister’s husband in defence of the sister against an assault with intention of abducting her by force, it was held that the private defence of body extended in the above circumstances to the causing of death. Reason (R): The word abducting in Section 100 IPC includes abduction simpliciter. Direction: The following four items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion (A) and the Reason (R) are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answer to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
Which is one of the following statements correctly describes the concept of ‘Mens rea’?
Which one of the following statements correctly describes the concept of Mens rea ?
Section 392 of IPC describes the punishment for robbery:
Which of the following is false of Section 34 and Section 149 of the IPC?
Section 76 and Section 79 of IPC provide the general exception of:
Under section 82 & section 83 of IPC an offence is punishable if it is done by a child:
Assertion (A): X and Y had independently entertained the idea to kill Z. Accordingly each of them separately inflicted wounds on Z, who dies in consequence. X and Y are liable for murder with the aid of Section 34 IPC. Reason (R): When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each of such persons is liable as if the whole act is done by him alone. Of the above statements.
Which one of the following brings out the distinction between Section 34 and 149 of the IPC?