Should both offer and acceptance be absolute, unqualified and unconditional?

Related MCQs

• Consider the following statements: 1. There is no difference between the English law and Indian law with regard to acceptance through post. 2. Both under the English law and the Indian law a contract is concluded when the letter of acceptance is posted 3. Under the Indian law when the letter of acceptance is posted it is complete only as against the proposer. 4. It is complete only as against the proposer. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
• An offer which is allowed to remain offer for acceptance over a period of time is known as a
• An offer or its acceptance or both may be made
• Where a particular mode of communication of acceptance is not prescribed and the parties are not in each other's presence, the most authentic mode of communication of acceptance is the
• An acceptance will be revoked at any time before the communication of acceptance is complete against the acceptor, but not afterwards
• Sections 4 and 5 of the Indian Contract Act provide for communication of offer and acceptance and revocation thereof. In this relation, which one of the following is not correct?
• Partial acceptance of offer result in
• Acceptance is to offer what a lighted match is to a train of gun powder. This statement indicates
• Acceptance in ignorance of the offer is
• Can there be an acceptance of an offer which has not come to the knowledge of the offeree?