Training in what discipline would be beneficial but is not a necessity to a literary critic according to Leavis?

Related MCQs

• Leavis states, “But it is to be note that the improvement we ask for is of the critic, the critic as critic, and to count on it would be to count on the attainment of
• According to Leavis, philosophic training would benefit the critic by making clear that
• F. R. Leavis states, “By the critic of poetry I understand the complete reader: the ideal critic is
• "Literary Criticism and Philosophy" was written by F.R Leavis in response to which other critic?
• FR Leavis said the business of the literary critic is
• The ideal critic according to Leavis is the __________
• Dr. Wellek’s first criticism of Leavis is that Leavis didn’t develop
• What according to Leavis are the two distinct and different kinds of discipline?
• Leavis boldly announced that Literary Criticism is not _____________
• Leavis says that his and Wellek’s approaches are different because he is a critic, and Wellek is a