[Solved] A person can be made a party in the suit either as a plaintiff or a defendant:

Q.	A person can be made a party in the suit either as a plaintiff or a defendant:
A.	under Order I, Rule 8A of CPC
B.	under Order I, Rule 10 of CPC
C.	under Order X, Rule 1 of CPC
D.	under Order X, Rule 8 of CPC.
Answer» B. under Order I, Rule 10 of CPC

597

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Civil Procedure Code (CPC)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Where a person who is a necessary party to the suit has not been joined as a party to the suit; it is a case of:
Court may order defendant or plaintiff to appear in person under which of the following in the Code of Civil Procedure?
Summons to the defendant under Order V, Rule 9(1) of CPC, can be delivered for the purposes of serving the same on the defendant, to a courier services as:
Which of the following deals with the dismissal of suit where summons not served in consequence of plaintiff‟s failure to pay costs in the Code of Civil Procedure?
In which of the following way notwithstanding that the former suit was disposed of, a matter will be said to have been „heard and finally decided‟? I. Ex parte II. By dismissal under O. 17 r 3, but not when the dismissal is under O. 16 r 1 for the failure to pay adjournment cost III. By a decree on an award IV. By oath tendered under s. 8 of the Indian Oaths Act, 1873 V. By dismissal owing to plaintiff’s failure to adduce evidence at the hearing
A defendant to a suit against whom no relief is claimed is called
A, claiming to be the chela and heir of a deceased mohunt sues B for rent of certain lands forming part of the estate of the mohunt. C claims that he, and not A, is the chela and heir of the deceased and that he is entitled to the rent. C is thereupon jointed as a defendant to the suit. The issues raised are: Whether A or C is the chela and heir of the mohunt? Whether any and if so what rent is due from B? The Court finds that A is the chela and heir of the mohunt. It also finds Rs. 2,500 due by B for rent, and A‟s claim is decreed. Subsequently, C sues A for a declaration that he is the chela and heir of the mohunt and claims that as such he is entitled to the whole of the property left by the mohunt. A contends that the question, who is the chela and heir of the deceased, is res judicata.
A revision under section 115 shall notoperate as a stay of suit or other proceedingbefore the court except where such suit or other proceeding is stayed by:
On rejection of a suit under Order VII, Rule 11 of CPC, a fresh suit on the same cause of action under Order VII, Rule 13 of CPC:
A suit is bad for non-joinder of a necessary party, as provided: