Imagine, you are solving a classification problems with highly imbalanced class. The majority class is observed 99% of times in the training data. Your model has 99% accuracy after taking the predictions on test data. Which of the following is true in such a case?
1. Accuracy metric is not a good idea for imbalanced class problems.
2.Accuracy metric is a good idea for imbalanced class problems.
3.Precision and recall metrics are good for imbalanced class problems.
4.Precision and recall metrics aren’t good for imbalanced class problems.

Related MCQs

• Suppose, you want to apply a stepwise forward selection method for choosing the best models for an ensemble model. Which of the following is the correct order of the steps? Note: You have more than 1000 models predictions 1. Add the models predictions (or in another term take the average) one by one in the ensemble which improves the metrics in the validation set. 2. Start with empty ensemble 3. Return the ensemble from the nested set of ensembles that has maximum performance on the validation set
• Which of the following can be one of the steps in stacking? 1. Divide the training data into k folds 2. Train k models on each k-1 folds and get the out of fold predictions for remaining one fold 3. Divide the test data set in “k” folds and get individual fold predictions by different algorithms
• We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, What do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
• We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
• We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
• We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
• You've just finished training a decision tree for spam classification, and it is getting abnormally bad performance on both your training and test sets. You know that your implementation has no bugs, so what could be causing the problem?
• Suppose you are given ‘n’ predictions on test data by ‘n’ different models (M1, M2, …. Mn) respectively. Which of the following method(s) can be used to combine the predictions of these models? Note: We are working on a regression problem 1. Median 2. Product 3. Average 4. Weighted sum 5. Minimum and Maximum 6. Generalized mean rule
• A company has build a kNN classifier that gets 100% accuracy on training data. When they deployed this model on client side it has been found that the model is not at all accurate. Which of the following thing might gone wrong? Note: Model has successfully deployed and no technical issues are found at client side except the model performance
• Suppose on performing reduced error pruning, we collapsed a node and observed an improvement in the prediction accuracy on the validation set. Which among the following statements are possible in light of the performance improvement observed? (a) The collapsed node helped overcome the effect of one or more noise affected data points in the training set (b) The validation set had one or more noise affected data points in the region corresponding to the collapsed node (c) The validation set did not have any data points along at least one of the collapsed branches (d) The validation set did have data points adversely affected by the collapsed node