McqMate
Sign In
Hamberger menu
McqMate
Sign in
Sign up
Home
Forum
Search
Ask a Question
Sign In
McqMate Copyright © 2025
→
Computer Science Engineering (CSE)
→
Machine Learning (ML)
→
Can a model trained for item based simil...
Q.
Can a model trained for item based similarity also choose from a given set of items?
A.
yes
B.
no
Answer» A. yes
2.9k
0
Do you find this helpful?
6
View all MCQs in
Machine Learning (ML)
Discussion
No comments yet
Login to comment
Related MCQs
Assume that you are given a data set and a neural network model trained on the data set. You are asked to build a decision tree model with the sole purpose of understanding/interpreting the built neural network model. In such a scenario, which among the following measures would you concentrate most on optimising?
If an item set ‘XYZ’ is a frequent item set, then all subsets of that frequent item set are
Which of the following are correct statement(s) about stacking? 1. A machine learning model is trained on predictions of multiple machine learning models 2. A Logistic regression will definitely work better in the second stage as compared to other classification methods 3. First stage models are trained on full / partial feature space of training data
Which of the following are correct statement(s) about stacking? A machine learning model is trained on predictions of multiple machine learning models A Logistic regression will definitely work better in the second stage as compared to other classification methods First stage models are trained on full / partial feature space of training data
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, What do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
Suppose on performing reduced error pruning, we collapsed a node and observed an improvement in the prediction accuracy on the validation set. Which among the following statements are possible in light of the performance improvement observed? (a) The collapsed node helped overcome the effect of one or more noise affected data points in the training set (b) The validation set had one or more noise affected data points in the region corresponding to the collapsed node (c) The validation set did not have any data points along at least one of the collapsed branches (d) The validation set did have data points adversely affected by the collapsed node
Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting. Which of the following is best option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?