[Solved] Let's say, a Linear regression model perfectly fits the training data (train error

Q.	Let's say, a Linear regression model perfectly fits the training data (train error
A.	you will always have test error zero
B.	you can not have test error zero
C.	none of the above
Answer» C. none of the above

1.5k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Machine Learning (ML)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Let�s say, a �Linear regression� model perfectly fits the training data (train error is zero). Now, Which of the following statement is true?
Let’s say, a “Linear regression” model perfectly fits the training data (train error is zero). Now, Which of the following statement is true?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, What do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
What is/are true about ridge regression? 1. When lambda is 0, model works like linear regression model 2. When lambda is 0, model doesn't work like linear regression model 3. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very small coefficients approaching 0 4. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very large coefficients approaching infinity
What is/are true about ridge regression? 1. When lambda is 0, model works like linear regression model 2. When lambda is 0, model doesn’t work like linear regression model 3. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very small coefficients approaching 0 4. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very large coefficients approaching infinity
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. What do you expect will happen with bias and variance as you increase the size of training data?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. What do you expect will happen with bias and variance as you increase the size of training data?