What is the reason behind a Turing machine is more powerful than finite state machine FSM?

Related MCQs

• Which of the following statements is/are FALSE? (1) For every non-deterministic Turing machine, there exists an equivalent deterministic Turing machine. (2) Turing recognizable languages are closed under union and complementation. (3) Turing decidable languages are closed under intersection and complementation (4) Turing recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection.
• He difference between a read-only Turing machine and a two-way finite state machine is
• TM is more powerful than FSM because
• State table of an FSM is given below. There are two states A And B, one input and one output. Let the initial state be A = 0 and B = 0. To take the machine to the state A = 0 and B = 1 with output = 1 the minimum length of input string required will be
• Consider the state table of a finite state machine that has input x and a single output z. The shortest input sequence to reach the final state C if the initial state is unknown is
• Consider the following problem x. Given a Turing machine M over the input alphabet Σ, any state q of M. And a word w Є Σ*, does the computation of M on w visit the state q? Which of the following statements about x is correct?
• A FSM can be considered, having finite tape length without rewinding capability and unidirectional tape movement
• Which of the following is true with respect to Kleene’s theorem? 1 A regular language is accepted by a finite automaton. 2 Every language is accepted by a finite automaton or a turingmachine.
• Given a Non-deterministic Finite Automation (NFA) with states p and r as initial and final states respectively and transition table as given below: A B P - Q q R S r R S s R S The minimum number of states required in Deterministic Finite Automation (DFA) equivalent to NFA is
• Which one of the following is the strongest correct statement about a finite language Lover a finite alphabet Σ?