[Solved] Consider the following grammar. S -> S * E S -> E E -> F + E E -> F F -> id Consider the following LR(0) items corresponding to the grammar above. (i) S -> S * .E (ii) E -> F. + E (iii) E -> F + .E Given the items above, which two of them will appear in the same set in the canonical sets-of-items for the grammar?

Q.	Consider the following grammar. S -> S * E S -> E E -> F + E E -> F F -> id Consider the following LR(0) items corresponding to the grammar above. (i) S -> S * .E (ii) E -> F. + E (iii) E -> F + .E Given the items above, which two of them will appear in the same set in the canonical sets-of-items for the grammar?
A.	(i) and (ii)
B.	(ii) and (iii)
C.	(i) and (iii)
D.	None of the above
Answer» D. None of the above

989

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Theory of Computation and Compiler Design

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Consider the following expression grammar. The seman-tic rules for expression calculation are stated next to each grammar production. E → number E.val = number. val | E '+' E E(1).val = E(2).val + E(3).val | E '×' E E(1).val = E(2).val × E(3).val The above grammar and the semantic rules are fed to a yacc tool (which is an LALR (1) parser generator) for parsing and evaluating arithmetic expressions. Which one of the following is true about the action of yacc for the given grammar?
Consider the following two sets of LR(1) items of an LR(1) grammar. X -> c.X, c/d X -> .cX, c/d X -> .d, c/d X -> c.X, $ X -> .cX, $ X -> .d, $ Which of the following statements related to merging of the two sets in the corresponding LALR parser is/are FALSE? 1. Cannot be merged since look aheads are different. 2. Can be merged but will result in S-R conflict. 3. Can be merged but will result in R-R conflict. 4. Cannot be merged since goto on c will lead to two different sets.
A canonical set of items is given below S --> L. > R Q --> R. On input symbol < the set has
Which of the following are decidable? I. Whether the intersection of two regular languages is infinite II. Whether a given context-free language is regular III. Whether two push-down automata accept the same language IV. Whether a given grammar is context-free
Consider the following two statements: P: Every regular grammar is LL(1) Q: Every regular set has a LR(1) grammar Which of the following is TRUE?
Consider the following two problems on undirected graphs: α: Given G(V,E), does G have an independent set of size |v|—4? β: Given G(V,E), does G have an independent set of size 5? Which one of the following is TRUE?
Consider the following decision problems: (P1) Does a given finite state machine accept a given string (P2) Does a given context free grammar generate an infinite number of stings Which of the following statements is true?
Which of the following are decidable ? 1. whether the intersection of two regular language is infinite. 2. whether a give context free language is regular 3. whether two push down automata accept the same language. 4. whether a given grammar is context free
Consider the following grammars (S1) : A --> aBCD B --> bc|c C --> d|∈ D -> b (S2) : A --> aBCD B --> bc|∈ C --> d|c D -> b (S3) : A --> aBCD B --> bc|∈ C --> d|∈ D -> b (S4) : A --> aBCD B --> bc|c C --> d|c D -> b Which of the following grammar has same follow set for variable B?
Consider the following grammar: S → FR R → S | ε F → id In the predictive parser table, M, of the grammar the entries M[S, id] and M[R, $] respectively.