[Solved] The soft margin SVM is more preferred than the hard-margin SVM when-

Q.	The soft margin SVM is more preferred than the hard-margin SVM when-
A.	the data is linearly seperable
B.	the data is noisy and contains overlapping points
C.	the data is not noisy and linearly seperable
D.	the data is noisy and linearly seperable
Answer» B. the data is noisy and contains overlapping points

680

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Machine Learning (ML)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting. Which of the following is best option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?
Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting.Which of the following option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?
Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting.Which of the following option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?
Suppose we train a hard-margin linear SVM on n > 100 data points in R2, yielding a hyperplane with exactly 2 support vectors. If we add one more data point and retrain the classifier, what is the maximum possible number of support vectors for the new hyperplane (assuming the n + 1 points are linearly separable)?
Let S1 and S2 be the set of support vectors and w1 and w2 be the learnt weight vectors for a linearly separable problem using hard and soft margin linear SVMs respectively. Which of the following are correct?
Solving a non linear separation problem with a hard margin Kernelized SVM (Gaussian RBF Kernel) might lead to overfitting
Solving a non linear separation problem with a hard margin Kernelized SVM (Gaussian RBF Kernel) might lead to overfitting
We usually use feature normalization before using the Gaussian kernel in SVM. What is true about feature normalization? 1. We do feature normalization so that new feature will dominate other 2. Some times, feature normalization is not feasible in case of categorical variables 3. Feature normalization always helps when we use Gaussian kernel in SVM
he minimum time complexity for training an SVM is O(n2). According to this fact, what sizes of datasets are not best suited for SVM’s?
Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it�s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very small C (C~0)?