[Solved] Point out incorrect response. In order to avail the defence under section 94 I.P.C. the following conditions must be fulfilled.

Q.	Point out incorrect response. In order to avail the defence under section 94 I.P.C. the following conditions must be fulfilled.
A.	Murder and offences against the State punishable with death are the two exceptions to the defence of compulsion as contained in section 94 I.P.C.
B.	Act must be done by a person who is compelled to do it by threats.
C.	The threat must be such, which at the time of doing of the act, reasonably causes the apprehension of instant death to that person.
D.	However the person doing the act did not of his own or from reasonable apprehension of any harm to himself, place himself in the situation by which he became subject to such constraint.
Answer» D. However the person doing the act did not of his own or from reasonable apprehension of any harm to himself, place himself in the situation by which he became subject to such constraint.

2.3k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Give incorrect response. In order to avail the defence under section 87 of the I.P.C. the following conditions must be fulfilled:
Give incorrect response. In order to avail the defence of section 88 I.P.C. :
Point out incorrect response. The right of private defence of body extends to the causing of death if the offence which occasions the exercise of the right of private defence is of the following description :
Point out incorrect response. The right of private defence of body extends to the causing of death if the offence which occasions the exercise of the right of private defence is of the following description :
Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the defence of accident under section 80 I.P.C. :-
Point out incorrect response. The following are ingredients of the defence of necessity under section 81 of the Penal Code :
Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the defence of unsoundness of mind under section 84 I.P.C. :
Point out incorrect response. The exercise of the right of private defence under the Penal Code is subject to the following limitations as contained in section 99 of the code :
Assertion (A): Where sister of X was being abducted by force from her parents house by her husband, X caused death of sister’s husband in defence of the sister against an assault with intention of abducting her by force, it was held that the private defence of body extended in the above circumstances to the causing of death. Reason (R): The word abducting in Section 100 IPC includes abduction simpliciter. Direction: The following four items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion (A) and the Reason (R) are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answer to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
Point out incorrect response. In Barendera Kumar Ghose Vs. Emperor, 52 I.A. 40, the appellant was charged under section 302 read with section 34 of the I.P.C. with the murder of a sub-postmaster. Sub-postmaster was counting money in the backroom. Several persons appeared at the door of the office and demanded the post master to give up the money and immediately afterwards fired pistols at him. Postmaster died immediately and the assailants fled in different directions without taking money. On of them was chased and caught with a pistol in his hand. It was not clear as to who fired the fatal shot. While holding the appellant liable for murder the Privy Council laid down the following principles: