McqMate
Sign In
Hamberger menu
McqMate
Sign in
Sign up
Home
Forum
Search
Ask a Question
Sign In
McqMate Copyright © 2026
→
Chemical Engineering
→
Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)
→
Criminal force implies:
Q.
Criminal force implies:
A.
Assault
B.
Battery
C.
Whipping
D.
None of the above.
Answer» B. Battery
3.2k
0
Do you find this helpful?
43
View all MCQs in
Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)
Discussion
No comments yet
Login to comment
Related MCQs
The offence of criminal conspiracy lies not in doing the act or effecting the purposes for which the conspiracy is formed but in the forming of the scheme between the parties. A criminal conspiracy consists of:
Assertion (A): The Indian Penal code contains certain exceptions from criminal liability. Reason (R): There cannot be universal criminal liability in all circumstances. Of the above statements.
Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable is dealt under-
Assertion (A): Where sister of X was being abducted by force from her parents house by her husband, X caused death of sister’s husband in defence of the sister against an assault with intention of abducting her by force, it was held that the private defence of body extended in the above circumstances to the causing of death. Reason (R): The word abducting in Section 100 IPC includes abduction simpliciter. Direction: The following four items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion (A) and the Reason (R) are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answer to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
Point out incorrect response. The following persons are exempted from the jurisdiction of criminal courts in India.
Point out incorrect response. The following persons are exempted from the jurisdiction of criminal courts in India.
Assertion (A): X and Y had independently entertained the idea to kill Z. Accordingly each of them separately inflicted wounds on Z, who dies in consequence. X and Y are liable for murder with the aid of Section 34 IPC. Reason (R): When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each of such persons is liable as if the whole act is done by him alone. Of the above statements.
To constitute an offence of criminal conspiracy, what is the necessary condition to be proved?
Section 34 of I.P.C. provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations: 1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A’s house. 2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang. 3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence. 4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale). Which of the situation given above reflect (s) the correct ingredients with regard of Section 34?
When a criminal act is done by several persons is furtherance of common intention of all: