In all cases of robbery, there is

Related MCQs

• Assertion (A): A person is not guilty of dacoity unless he has committed, attempted to commit or aided in committing robbery. Reason (R): When tow persons conjointly commit robbery, then every person so committing robbery is said to commit dacoity.
• Assertion (A): There is either theft or extortion in robbery. Reason (R): Theft or extortion precedes robbery. Direction: The following two items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion A and the Reason R are individually true and if so, whether the Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answers to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
• In cases where the act involves a specific mens rea, in cases of intoxication under section 86 of IPC:
• The right of P.D. of property against robbery continues as long as :
• Robbery is under:
• Section 392 of IPC describes the punishment for robbery:
• When Robbery is a dacoity?
• Attempt to commit robbery is under:
• The essence of the offence of robbery is:
• In case of robbery or dacoity, the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing: