[Solved] When a criminal act is done by several persons, in furtherance of a common intention of all, each of such persons is liable

Q.	When a criminal act is done by several persons, in furtherance of a common intention of all, each of such persons is liable
A.	For the part of the act done by him
B.	As if the whole of the act is done by him alone
C.	For abetting such an offence
D.	For conspiracy of such an offence.
Answer» C. For abetting such an offence

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Assertion (A): X and Y had independently entertained the idea to kill Z. Accordingly each of them separately inflicted wounds on Z, who dies in consequence. X and Y are liable for murder with the aid of Section 34 IPC. Reason (R): When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each of such persons is liable as if the whole act is done by him alone. Of the above statements.
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each one of them is liable:
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all each one of them is liable:
Assertion (A): X and Y independently intending to kill Z strike him with iron rod on his head. Z dies as a result of the injuries. Both X and Y are guilty of murder under Section 302/304, Indian Penal Code. Reason (R): When a criminal act is done by several person in furtherance of common intention of all, each of them is liable as if it was done by him alone.Of the above statements.
When a criminal act is done by several persons is furtherance of common intention of all:
Give the correct response? When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all :
A is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention. Under which one of the following situations can his offence be proved?
Use of violence by a member of an assembly of five or more persons in furtherance of common object will constitute
T instigates C, a child under seven years of age to do an act which can cause X’s death. In consequence of this C cause X’s death in absence of T. With reference to the above statement” Assertion (A): T is liable for murder of X, even though the actual act has been committed by an infant. Reason (R): The liability of the abettor depends upon the capability and knowledge or intention of the person abetted. Of the above statements.
Under Sec. 149 if any offence is done by any member of unlawful assembly in furtherance of common object :