Can a letter of acceptance to a Proposer, not correctly addressed, although posted, be said to have been "Put in a course of transaction" to him?

Related MCQs

• Consider the following statements: 1. There is no difference between the English law and Indian law with regard to acceptance through post. 2. Both under the English law and the Indian law a contract is concluded when the letter of acceptance is posted 3. Under the Indian law when the letter of acceptance is posted it is complete only as against the proposer. 4. It is complete only as against the proposer. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
• When parties enter into a contract on telephone the contract becomes complete at the place where acceptance is heard by the proposer. This has been provided
• Which section of Law of Contract defines, "A proposal may be revoked at anytime, before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards."
• Acceptance takes place as against the proposer, when
• Where a particular mode of communication of acceptance is not prescribed and the parties are not in each other's presence, the most authentic mode of communication of acceptance is the
• An acceptance will be revoked at any time before the communication of acceptance is complete against the acceptor, but not afterwards
• Death or insanity of the proposer will revoke the proposal
• A paid `500 to a Government servant to get him a contract for the canteen. The Government servant could not get the contract. Can A recover `500 paid by him to the Government servant?
• A paid ` 500 to a Government servant to get him a contract for the canteen. The Government servant could not get the contract. Can A recover ` 500 paid by him to the Government servant?
• When the proposal or acceptance is made other wise than words, the promise is said to be