Consider the following statements: 1. There is no difference between the English law and Indian law with regard to acceptance through post. 2. Both under the English law and the Indian law a contract is concluded when the letter of acceptance is posted 3. Under the Indian law when the letter of acceptance is posted it is complete only as against the proposer. 4. It is complete only as against the proposer. Which of the above statements is/are correct?

Related MCQs

• Can a letter of acceptance to a Proposer, not correctly addressed, although posted, be said to have been "Put in a course of transaction" to him?
• Which section of Law of Contract defines, "A proposal may be revoked at anytime, before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards."
• When parties enter into a contract on telephone the contract becomes complete at the place where acceptance is heard by the proposer. This has been provided
• Consider the following statements: 1. General offer require the communication of acceptance. 2. All contracts are agreements 3. All agreements are contracts 4. All illegal agreements are void agreements Which of the statements given above are correct?
• Acceptance takes place as against the proposer, when
• An acceptance will be revoked at any time before the communication of acceptance is complete against the acceptor, but not afterwards
• Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods, and the goods perish before the making of contract, without the knowledge of the seller, the contract is
• Sections 4 and 5 of the Indian Contract Act provide for communication of offer and acceptance and revocation thereof. In this relation, which one of the following is not correct?
• The law regarding Novation, i.e., where a new contract is substituted in place of the old one by means of an agreement between the parties to a contract or between them and a third party, is contained in
• A minor enters into agreement representing himself to be a major consider the following statement: 1. Minor commits fraud if the other party does not have personal knowledge of his age 2. Such agreement is not enforceable 3. The doctrine of estoppel does not apply in minor's case 4. Other party is entitled to get back the benefit passed to minor, if innocent about his age Which of the statements given above are correct?