McqMate
| Q. |
Which type of developer should not be used with a visible dye penetrant process? |
| A. | Dry |
| B. | Non-aqueous wet |
| C. | Water soluble |
| D. | Water suspendable |
| Answer» A. Dry | |
2.4k
1
Do you find this helpful?
1
View all MCQs in
Non Destructive Testing and EvaluationDiscussion
Zohir Kihal
1 year ago
Water soluble developers are not recommended for use with water washable penetrants, iwith these penetrants the water soluble developer will act as an additional emulsifier and wash the penetrant away
0
Related MCQs
- Why is the need for a dry surface prior to developer application more of a disadvantage with a dry developer than with a non-aqueous wet developer?
- When using a post emulsifiable penetrant process, it is important to drain as much excess penetrant as possible from the surface of a test piece which has been immersed in the penetrant because:
- During a visible, solvent removable penetrant test, complete penetrant removal is indicated by:
- The advantages of using a visible solvent removable penetrant versus a post emulsified fluorescent penetrant is:
- Fluorescent penetrant indications are more visible than colour contrast penetrant indications because:
- Which type of developer does not (!) provide a contrasting background against which to view penetrant indications?
- A penetrant process which employs an emulsifier as a separate step in the penetrant removal process is called:
- It is easier to control developer coating thickness with a soluble developer than a water suspendable one because:
- A penetrant process in which excess penetrant is removed with an organic solvent is called:
- Excess penetrant removal is a two step process with which of the following penetrant methods?