Is it fine to call delete twice for a pointer?
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int *ptr = new int;
delete ptr;
delete ptr;
return 0;
}

Related MCQs

• Output of following program? #include <iostream> using namespace std; int fun(int=0, int = 0); int main() { cout << fun(5); return 0; } int fun(int x, int y) { return (x+y); }
• Output of the program? #include<iostream> using namespace std; int fun(int x = 0, int y = 0, int z) { return (x + y + z); } int main() { cout << fun(10); return 0; }
• Output of following C++ program? #include<iostream> using namespace std; int main() { int x = 10; int& ref = x; ref = 20; cout << "x = " << x << endl ; x = 30; cout << "ref = " << ref << endl; return 0; }
• What happens when delete is used for a NULL pointer? int *ptr = NULL; delete ptr;
• Predict the output? #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Test { int x; Test() { x = 5; } }; int main() { Test *t = new Test; cout << t->x; }
• Output of following program? #include<iostream> using namespace std; class Point { Point() { cout << "Constructor called"; } }; int main() { Point t1; return 0; }
• #include<iostream> using namespace std; class Point { public: Point() { cout << "Constructor called"; } }; int main() { Point t1, *t2; return 0; }
• Predict the output of following C++ program. #include<iostream> using namespace std; class Empty {}; int main() { cout << sizeof(Empty); return 0; }
• Which of the following is true about new when compared with malloc: 1) new is an operator, malloc is a function 2) new calls constructor, malloc doesn’t 3) new returns appropriate pointer, malloc returns void * and pointer needs to typecast to appropriate type.
• class Test { int x; }; int main() { Test t; cout << t.x; return 0; }