data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9031/c90313cade4c7424d68b2b131261fba7136e75bf" alt="Mcqmate logo"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eef4/7eef42071dd44866a54d2e204114a1e45333ebc7" alt="Mcqmate logo"
McqMate
Q. |
G’s party was engaged in the peaceful pursuit of worship at their own takhat was busy attending to the Puja for the Nepali pilgrim. At that point of time they were not members of an unlawful assembly. It was the party of A who left their place and came to G’s takhat, presumably raising a dispute over the offerings made by the Nepali pilgrim. They came armed with deadly weapons and one of them inflicted a severe blow on the S and G’s side which resulted in his death and others received as many as 27 serious injuries. |
A. | G’s party exercise the right to self defence |
B. | Both G and A’s party cannot claim the right to self defence |
C. | A’s party had full intention of causing harm |
D. | Both (A) and (C) |
Answer» D. Both (A) and (C) |
View all MCQs in
Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)No comments yet