[Solved] A & B entered into an ante nuptial agreement that they would be governed by the conjugal partnership of gains when they will get married. A year thereafter, they got married. Can they change their property relationship during the marriage?

Q.	A & B entered into an ante nuptial agreement that they would be governed by the conjugal partnership of gains when they will get married. A year thereafter, they got married. Can they change their property relationship during the marriage?
A.	They can enter into a contract changing their property relationship and from its perfection, they would be bound by another property regime.
B.	They can enter into a contract to change their property regime and it binds them due to the principle of liberty of contracts.
C.	They can enter into a contract changing their property regime but must file a petition in court for its approval.
D.	They can enter into a contract changing the property relationship and be bound thereby because of the principle of mutuality of contracts.
Answer» C. They can enter into a contract changing their property regime but must file a petition in court for its approval.

805

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Wendy, single, bought a parcel of land in Dagupan City from Amante for P600,000.00. A contract was executed between them which already vested upon Wendy full ownership of the property, although payable in monthly installments for a period of 4 years. One year after the execution of the contract, Wendy got married to Lorenzo. They executed a marriage settlement whereby they agreed that their properties shall be governed by the regime of conjugal partnership of gains. Thereafter, subsequent installments were paid from the conjugal partnership funds. Is the land conjugal or paraphernal?
Spouses Reynaldo and Ana decided to separate and to voluntary dissolve their conjugal partnership. Hence, they executed a public document wherein they declare that they had no debts, that they were voluntarily dissolving their conjugal partnership, and that each of them would thereafter be free to acquire or dispose of any property independently of the other. Thereafter, they lived apart. Ana engaged in business which unfortunately failed. Reynaldo, on the other hand, continued to be gainfully employed and was able to acquire properties through his own efforts. The creditors of Ana obtained a judgment against the latter which they could not satisfy because Ana was insolvent. Could the creditors of Ana obtain satisfaction of the judgment out of the properties of Reynaldo?
A and B were engaged to marry on April 3, 2012. They entered into a marriage settlement that they would be bound by the rule on co-ownership. Is the ante-nuptial agreement valid?
Bruce was pronounced by his physician to be suffering from an incurable disease and that he is going to die at anytime. Bruce was engaged to Margarita. In view of the pronouncement of Bruce’s doctor, the two got married without a marriage license. Six (6) months thereafter, Bruce died. The validity of their marriage was attacked on the ground that the marriage was not a marriage in articulo mortis. What is the status of the marriage between Bruce and Margarita.
A & B are married. They have properties and they are governed by the conjugal partnership of gains. They negotiated for the sale of one (1) of their properties to C, but when the signing of the contract came, B did not consent to the sale. During the negotiation, they delivered the property to C. Is the sale valid?
A and B are married. They have two (2) legitimate children. After A died, the heirs acquired properties from A’s estate. B got married to C, without liquidating their conjugal partnership. What property relationship governs them?
Marvin was married to Charina on February 14, 1990. Charina gave birth to a baby girl she named Noreen. Due to irreconcilable differences, Marvin left the conjugal dwelling. Charina, on the other hand fell in love with David and they decided to live together as husband and wife on May 12, 1992. Six (6) years after or on September 8, 1998, Marvin died in an accident. Free at last, Charina and David decided to get married on February 14, 2000 executing an affidavit that they have been living together as husband and wife for more than five (5) years. The marriage took place but the solemnizing officer failed to execute an affidavit that he ascertained the qualifications of the contracting parties. Two (2) years later, Charina died living a considerable amount of properties. Noreen, assisted by her grandparents, filed a petition questioning the validity of her marriage to David. If you were the judge, how will you decide on the petition?
A and B got married without the benefit of a license. During the marriage, A left B and got married to C, hence, B sued A for bigamy. In the meantime A sued B for declaration of nullity of their marriage and moved for the suspension of the criminal case. Will the action prosper?
A and B are married. They are governed by the conjugal partnership of gains. A, the Executive Vice-President of ABC Corp. signed as a surety in a loan secured by the company from Metrobank for the rehabilitation of the company. As business was good after rehabilitation, A was given a house and lot, a brand new caw and raise in his salary. The company was sued due to its failure to pay the loan. Are the properties of A and B liable?
A and B are married, but separated in fact. While in the practice of her profession, B acquired properties. They are governed by the conjugal partnership of gains. Who is/are the owner/s of the properties?