McqMate
These multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are designed to enhance your knowledge and understanding in the following areas: Uncategorized topics .
Chapters
1. |
A executed a will consisting of ten pages. At the probate, B, one of his children interposed an opposition on the ground that one of the pages of the same has not been signed by A and one of the witnesses. Rule on the opposition. |
A. | The testator and the instrumental witnesses must sign. |
B. | The defect is fatal if there is failure to have the original signatures. |
C. | If there was mere inadvertence of one of the true witnesses or even the testator, the will must be admitt |
Answer» C. If there was mere inadvertence of one of the true witnesses or even the testator, the will must be admitt |
2. |
A, a minor, executed a last will and testament. He died at the age of 21, after which his will was submitted to probate. If you were the judge, would you approve it? |
A. | Yes, because the will is valid. |
B. | Yes, because the testator is capacitated. |
C. | No, because the will is vo |
Answer» C. No, because the will is vo |
3. |
The attestation clause of X’s will do not contain his signature. At its probate, it is being opposed on that basis. Is the opposition correct? Choose the best answer. |
A. | Yes, because it is fatal defect. |
B. | Yes, the will is not valid. |
C. | No, attestation clause is not an act of the testator. |
D. | No, attestation clause is not a part of a will. |
Answer» C. No, attestation clause is not an act of the testator. |
4. |
After A has executed a will, he tore it out of anger because B and C were disputing the fact that a house and lot at San Lorenzo Village should have been given by A to C when the will gives it to B. Discuss whether the will was revoked or not. |
A. | The mere act of A is immaterial |
B. | The tearing of the will may amount to revocation |
C. | The tearing of the will may amount to revocation if coupled with intent of revoking it. |
D. | The act of tearing the will is material. |
Answer» C. The tearing of the will may amount to revocation if coupled with intent of revoking it. |
5. |
What is the effect if the second heir dies ahead of the first heir in a fideicommisary substitution? Choose the best answer. |
A. | No, transmission of right from the first heir to the second. |
B. | No right of representation |
C. | The right shall be transmitted to the heirs of the second heir. |
D. | None of the above. |
Answer» C. The right shall be transmitted to the heirs of the second heir. |
6. |
Suppose the reservista is survived by the uncles and aunts and by the nephews and nieces of the propositus, who shall be entitled to the property reserved? Choose the best answer. |
A. | The uncles and aunts shall inherit the property |
B. | The nephews and nieces of the decedent survive and are willing and qualified. |
C. | The uncles and nephews shall inherit together. |
D. | The aunts and nieces shall inherit together. |
Answer» B. The nephews and nieces of the decedent survive and are willing and qualified. |
7. |
X and Y are married. The marriage was contracted under articulo mortis, and the testator died within 3 months from the time of marriage. What is X’s share of his spouse’s inheritance? Choose the best answer. |
A. | The surviving spouse shall inherit the whole hereditary estate. |
B. | The surviving spouse shall inherit ½ of the estate. |
C. | The surviving spouse shall inherit 1/3 of the estate. |
D. | The surviving spouse shall inherit ¾ of the estate. |
Answer» C. The surviving spouse shall inherit 1/3 of the estate. |
8. |
X and Y are married. They have children A, B, and C. During the lifetime of X, A renounced his inheritance from his father. Upon X’s death, will the right of accretion apply? |
A. | Yes, A may renounced his inheritance from his father. |
B. | Yes, the right of accretion applies. |
C. | No, because the renunciation is vo |
Answer» B. Yes, the right of accretion applies. |
9. |
A repudiated his inheritance from his father. Can he be represented by his son, B? |
A. | Yes, repudiation do not affect right of representation. |
B. | No, because heirs who repudiate their share may not be represented. |
C. | Yes, because the act of repudiation is contrary to public policy. |
D. | None of the above. |
Answer» B. No, because heirs who repudiate their share may not be represented. |
10. |
If a compulsory heir is disinherited, is it limited to his legitime? |
A. | No, it also covers the free portion. |
B. | Yes, it is limited only to his legitime. |
C. | Disinheritance affect only the free portion but not the legitime |
D. | None of the above. |
Answer» A. No, it also covers the free portion. |
11. |
Rights to succession are transmitted: |
A. | On date of last will and testament |
B. | On probate of will |
C. | On death of testator |
D. | On date of death of surviving heir |
Answer» C. On death of testator |
12. |
What law shall determine the validity of a will? |
A. | The national law of testator |
B. | The law at the time it is made |
C. | The law at the time of probate of the will |
D. | The law at the time of death of the testator |
Answer» B. The law at the time it is made |
13. |
A holographic has no date except one found on the first page, is the will valid? |
A. | Yes, because the law does not specify the place where the date should be placed. |
B. | No, because the date should be after the signature of the testator. |
C. | No, because it did not follow the requirements of law. |
D. | Yes, because the intention of the testator must be respected. |
Answer» A. Yes, because the law does not specify the place where the date should be placed. |
14. |
In case a holographic will is lost, can it still be probated? |
A. | No, because the best and only evidence of the handwriting is the will itself. |
B. | No, the probate court has no jurisdiction. |
C. | No, because the testator is still living. |
D. | Yes, because secondary evidence may be presented. |
Answer» A. No, because the best and only evidence of the handwriting is the will itself. |
15. |
Disposition captatoria means that the heir shall make provisions in his will: |
A. | In favor of another heir |
B. | In favor of testator or any other person |
C. | In favor of the state |
D. | In favor of a legatee |
Answer» B. In favor of testator or any other person |
16. |
Preterition or omission of one, some, or all the compulsory heirs, or some of compulsory heirs in the direct line whether living at the time of the execution of the will or born after the death of the testator shall: |
A. | Make the will voidable |
B. | Make the will void |
C. | Annul the institution of heirs |
D. | Make the will unenforceable |
Answer» C. Annul the institution of heirs |
17. |
After the probate of a will, may a case for forgery be filed against an instituted heir? |
A. | No, because the probate of the will is an evidence of its due execution and authenticity. |
B. | No, because the probate of the will is a justifying circumstance. |
C. | Yes, because a forgery is a criminal action. |
D. | Yes, because this is a statutory right. |
Answer» A. No, because the probate of the will is an evidence of its due execution and authenticity. |
18. |
When an injury or damage is caused to another, there being fault or negligence and there is no pre-existing contractual relation between the parties, the source of the obligation is: |
A. | Law |
B. | Contracts |
C. | Quasi-contracts |
D. | Quasi-delicts |
Answer» D. Quasi-delicts |
19. |
The bailee has the right to be reimbursed in full for advances he made for extraordinary expenses of preservation of the subject matter in commodatum. |
A. | he gave notice to the bailor before he incurred the expense. |
B. | if the extraordinary expense arose out of the actual use of the thing. |
C. | if the bailee was negligent in the use of the thing borrow |
Answer» A. he gave notice to the bailor before he incurred the expense. |
20. |
What are the objectives of Probate proceedings? |
A. | Probate proceedings seek to establish the identity of the will, its genuineness and due execution, and the testamentary capacity of the testator. |
B. | Probate seeks to determine whether the will is formally valid. |
C. | Probate seeks to determine whether the will is intrinsically val |
Answer» B. Probate seeks to determine whether the will is formally valid. |
21. |
The borrower in a contract of loan or mutuum must pay interest to the lender. |
A. | if there is an agreement in writing to that effect. |
B. | as a matter of course. |
C. | if the amount borrowed is very large. |
D. | if the lender so demands at the maturity date. |
Answer» A. if there is an agreement in writing to that effect. |
22. |
This party in a reserva troncal is the descendant (brother or sister) whose death gives rise to the reserve and from whom therefore the third degree is counted is known as: |
A. | Origin |
B. | Propositus |
C. | Reservista |
D. | Reservatorios |
Answer» B. Propositus |
23. |
A has a son B and the latter adopted C. B predeceased his father. Can C represent B in the inheritance of A? |
A. | Yes, he is a compulsory heir. |
B. | Yes, he is the legal representative. |
C. | No, there is no blood relationship between A and C. |
D. | No, he is a voluntary heir. |
Answer» C. No, there is no blood relationship between A and C. |
24. |
X during his lifetime sold and conveyed two (2) parcels of land to his heirs. After X’s death and the probate of his will, are the conveyed properties subject to collation for determination of the heirs’ legitime? |
A. | No, because X is no longer the owner of the conveyed properties. |
B. | No, because there was no gratuitous conveyance. |
C. | Yes, because the heirs are already the owners of the conveyed properties. |
D. | Yes, they are considered advanced legitime. |
Answer» B. No, because there was no gratuitous conveyance. |
25. |
Can a criminal convicted of a crime which carries civil interdiction execute his will? |
A. | Yes, it is his statutory right. |
B. | No, it is an accessory penalty. |
C. | Yes, it only prohibits disposition of property inter vivos, not mortis causa. |
D. | No, it is inconsistent with public policy. |
Answer» C. Yes, it only prohibits disposition of property inter vivos, not mortis causa. |
26. |
Spouses M and N executed two (2) separate wills containing the same provisions. After their death, their compulsory heirs filed a petition for joint probate of their wills. One of the voluntary heirs objected because joint probate is invalid. Is the objection tenable? |
A. | Yes, joint wills are not allowed in the Civil Code. |
B. | Yes, because the wills have different voluntary heirs. |
C. | No, because M and N are spouses. |
D. | No, because practicable considerations dictate the joint probate of the wills. |
Answer» D. No, because practicable considerations dictate the joint probate of the wills. |
27. |
X was disinherited by his father Y. In the probate of Y’s will, can the children of X represent their disinherited father? |
A. | No, the disinheritance affects the heirs of the disinherited person. |
B. | Yes, representation is allowed in case of disinheritance. |
C. | Yes, substitution of the disinherited person is allow |
Answer» B. Yes, representation is allowed in case of disinheritance. |
28. |
State the share in the estate of the testator of illegitimate children who survive with the surviving spouse. |
A. | 1/3 |
B. | ¼ |
C. | 1/8 |
D. | ½ |
Answer» A. 1/3 |
29. |
A complaint of forgery was filed against instituted heir after the allowance of probate of the testator’s will. Will this action prosper? |
A. | No, the probate of the will is an evidence of the due execution of the will. |
B. | No, the probate is a justifying circumstance. |
C. | Yes, forgery is a criminal action. |
D. | Yes, this is a statutory right. |
Answer» A. No, the probate of the will is an evidence of the due execution of the will. |
30. |
In reserve troncal the relatives within third degree coming from the same line inherit from: |
A. | Descendant propositus |
B. | Reservista |
C. | Origin |
D. | Testator |
Answer» A. Descendant propositus |
31. |
The renunciation or repudiation of inheritance shall take effect: |
A. | Date of repudiation or renunciation |
B. | Date of will |
C. | Date of allowance of will |
D. | Date of death of testator |
Answer» D. Date of death of testator |
32. |
Disposition Captatoria is void because the heir makes a disposition in his will in favor of: |
A. | another heir |
B. | testator |
C. | the State |
D. | a legatee or devisee |
Answer» B. testator |
33. |
May the alluvial deposits be lost by prescription in favor of another? Choose the best answer. |
A. | No, because there is registration by fiction of law. |
B. | No, because it is covered by a Torrens title. |
C. | Yes, because it is not covered by a Torrens title. |
D. | Yes |
Answer» A. No, because there is registration by fiction of law. |
34. |
The northeastern portion of the land of X is bounded by the Manila bay. If there is accretion formed, who owns the accretion? Choose the best answer. |
A. | The riparian owner. |
B. | The accretion belongs to the state. |
C. | The owner of the contiguous la |
Answer» B. The accretion belongs to the state. |
35. |
Which of the following is not a characteristic of a co-ownership? |
A. | There must be more than one subject or owner. |
B. | There is one physical whole divided into ideal shares. |
C. | Each share is definite in amount, but is not physically segregated from the first. |
D. | The co-ownership has juridical personality. |
Answer» D. The co-ownership has juridical personality. |
36. |
The following are modes of extinguishing usufruct except, |
A. | Expiration of the period for which it was constituted. |
B. | Merger of the usufruct and ownership in the same person. |
C. | Total loss of the thing. |
D. | Bad use of the thing in usufruct. |
Answer» D. Bad use of the thing in usufruct. |
37. |
X,Y, and Z are co-owners of a real property which was mortgaged to A. X redeemed it during the period of redemption with his personal funds. Did X become the sole owner of the property, thereby terminating the co-ownership? |
A. | Yes, because his redemption vest in him sole ownership. |
B. | Yes, because the funds belong to him alone. |
C. | No, because the redemption inured to the benefit of all co-owners. |
D. | No, because Y and Z did not consent to the redemption. |
Answer» C. No, because the redemption inured to the benefit of all co-owners. |
38. |
The following are the classes of possession except. |
A. | Possession in one’s name or possession in the name of another. |
B. | Possession in the concept of an owner or possession in the concept of a holder. |
C. | Possession in good faith or bad faith. |
D. | Possession with just title. |
Answer» C. Possession in good faith or bad faith. |
39. |
The following are the requisites of the easement of right of way, except. |
A. | The property is surrounded by other estate. |
B. | There must be no adequate outlet to a public highway. |
C. | There must be indemnity. |
D. | That if there is outlet, it is not convenient to the dominant estate. |
Answer» D. That if there is outlet, it is not convenient to the dominant estate. |
40. |
The following are disqualified to donate to each other, except. |
A. | Those guilty of adultery or concubinage at the time of the donation. |
B. | Those found guilty of the same criminal offense in consideration thereof. |
C. | Those made to public officers or their spouses, descendants, or ascendants, by reason of their office. |
D. | Those obliged to support one another. |
Answer» D. Those obliged to support one another. |
41. |
The following are the remedies against private nuisance, except. |
A. | A civil action |
B. | A prosecution under the penal code or any local ordinance. |
C. | Abatement without judicial proceedings. |
D. | None of the above. |
Answer» B. A prosecution under the penal code or any local ordinance. |
42. |
The nature of action in Quieting of Title is in personam. |
A. | No, it is always a real action since the subject is real property. |
B. | No, because the decision is enforceable against the whole world. |
C. | Yes, provided the subject is personal property. |
D. | Yes, because the decision is enforceable only against the defeated party. |
Answer» B. No, because the decision is enforceable against the whole world. |
43. |
Minerals are still owned by the state even if discovered from a private land. |
A. | Yes, provided the land is not titled. |
B. | Yes, because the constitution so provides. |
C. | No, if the land is titled to a private person. |
D. | No, it will violate property and property rights. |
Answer» B. Yes, because the constitution so provides. |
44. |
The owner and the tenant are in both possession of the land subject of the lease contract. |
A. | No, only the tenant, because he is in actual possession of the land. |
B. | No, only the owner, because the other is just a mere tenant. |
C. | Yes, but of different concept. |
D. | No, either of them. |
Answer» D. No, either of them. |
45. |
Negative easement may be acquired by prescription through notarial prohibition. |
A. | No, because it is non-apparent. |
B. | Yes, because notarial prohibition makes apparent what is non-apparent. |
C. | Yes, because it is provided for by law. |
D. | Yes, only after 10 years from service of notarial prohibition. |
Answer» C. Yes, because it is provided for by law. |
46. |
In case of roots of a neighboring tree intruded to the state of another, the neighboring owner has the right to cut it off. |
A. | Yes, only after his demand for the cutting is ignored. |
B. | Yes, because he owns the roots that intruded at his property. |
C. | No, without permission from the owner of the tree. |
D. | Yes, only after 10 years of prescription. |
Answer» B. Yes, because he owns the roots that intruded at his property. |
47. |
Which statement is correct?
|
A. | Both statements are correct. |
B. | Statement 1 is correct; statement 2 is incorrect. |
C. | Statement 1 is correct; statement 2 is correct. |
D. | none |
Answer» A. Both statements are correct. |
48. |
It is a process whereby the current of a river, creek, or torrent segregates from an estate on its bank a known portion of land and transfers it to another estate. Such process is known as: |
A. | Alluvion |
B. | Avulsion |
C. | Adjunction |
D. | Commixtion |
Answer» B. Avulsion |
49. |
Which provision of the Condominium Act (RA 4796) is correct?
|
A. | Provision 1 is correct, 2 is incorrect. |
B. | Both provisions are incorrect. |
C. | Both provisions are correct. |
D. | Provision 1 is incorrect, 2 is correct. |
Answer» A. Provision 1 is correct, 2 is incorrect. |
50. |
In like manner, Bad Faith is not presumed. Why? |
A. | Yes, because bad faith is personal. |
B. | Yes, because bad faith could be inherited. |
C. | Yes, because ignorance of the law excuses no one. |
D. | Yes, because it should be proven in court. |
Answer» D. Yes, because it should be proven in court. |
Done Studing? Take A Test.
Great job completing your study session! Now it's time to put your knowledge to the test. Challenge yourself, see how much you've learned, and identify areas for improvement. Don’t worry, this is all part of the journey to mastery. Ready for the next step? Take a quiz to solidify what you've just studied.