[Solved] A executed a will in his handwriting with three (3) witnesses, one of whom is the notary public. The probate was contested on the ground that the notary public before whom it was acknowledged was one of the witnesses. How do you think the court will decide?

Q.	A executed a will in his handwriting with three (3) witnesses, one of whom is the notary public. The probate was contested on the ground that the notary public before whom it was acknowledged was one of the witnesses. How do you think the court will decide?
A.	It will declare the will void because there are only two (2) witnesses;
B.	It will declare the will void because the notary public cannot subscribe before himself;
C.	It may grant the probate and consider it a holographic will
D.	It will declare the will extrinsically void.
Answer» C. It may grant the probate and consider it a holographic will

1.2k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A, while travelling in Cananda executed a will before Philippine Consul B with only two (2) witnesses. Under Canadian Law, two (2) witnesses would suffice. When he arrived in the Philippines he filed a petition for probate. How do you think the court will decide?
A executed a 5-page notarial will before a notary public and three witnesses. All of them signed each and every page of the will. One of the witnesses was B, the father of one of the legatees to the will. What is the effect of B being a witness to the will?
At the time A executed his will there was a pronouncement that he was insane. A week after he died, but he was already of sound mind. If the will is submitted to probate, how do you think the court will decide?
A executed a will in English, but did not understand the language. If the will is submitted to probate, how do you think the court will decide?
A executed a will consisting of ten pages. At the probate, B, one of his children interposed an opposition on the ground that one of the pages of the same has not been signed by A and one of the witnesses. Rule on the opposition.
Spouses M and N executed two (2) separate wills containing the same provisions. After their death, their compulsory heirs filed a petition for joint probate of their wills. One of the voluntary heirs objected because joint probate is invalid. Is the objection tenable?
Mr. Tiok Chua executed a last will and testament. X, a niece was charged with the crime of forgery alleging that she forged Mr. Chua’s signature. In the meantime, the will was admitted to probate. State the effect of the admission of the will to probate.
X executed a will instituting his heirs. It was discovered 15 years after his death, hence, the heirs consulted you whether they can still file a petition for its probate, considering that they have already extrajudicially settled his estate. What is your advice?
X executed a holographic will dated December 2000. After his death, A and B, the heirs filed a petition for probate, but C, the daughter opposed on the ground that the will is not valid because it is not completely dated.
One of the four (4) witnesses in the will of A is the notary public. Is the will valid?