![Mcqmate logo](https://mcqmate.com/public/images/logos/logo-black.png)
![Mcqmate logo](https://mcqmate.com/public/images/logos/logo-white.png)
McqMate
Q. |
In which case the Supreme Court held that material evidence and not the number of witnesses has to be taken note to ascertain the truth of the allegations made |
A. | surendra prasad tiwari v. state of uttar pradesh, air 2005 sc 125 |
B. | syed ibrahim v. state of andhnz pradesh, air 2006 sc 2908 |
C. | rajinder v. state of haryana, air 2006 sc 21 |
D. | iagdish murav v. state of llttar pradesh, air 2007 sc 35 |
Answer» B. syed ibrahim v. state of andhnz pradesh, air 2006 sc 2908 |
View all MCQs in
Indian Evidence ActNo comments yet