B, an accused wants to submit carbon copy of the suicide note as secondary evidence. The original is with the opposite party and he has failed to produce the same. The suicide was not within the knowledge of the accused prior to the receipt of carbon copy. Which of the following statements will hold true for the case?

Related MCQs

• Accused wants to submit a document for consideration under section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In which of the following cases will the document become irrelevant?
• Which of the following is the way to assess damage under Section 12, Indian Evidence Act? I. the damage suffered should be near as possible to the sum which will put the injured party in the same position as he would have been if he had not sus-tained the wrong for which he was awarded damages or compensationII. damages are usually assessed on the basis of actual loss suffered and are called general orordinary damagesIII. where the plaintiff has not suffered any real damages by reason of breach of contract, normally,nominal damages are awardedIV. special damages can be awarded for personal incon-veniences or physical dis-comfort caused bythe other party
• In which case the Supreme Court held that material evidence and not the number of witnesses has to be taken note to ascertain the truth of the allegations made
• Definition of secondary evidence has been given under ___ of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
• Which of the following statements hold true for section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
• Section 65, Indian Evidence Act with which of the fol-lowing situation under which secondary evidence can be given?
• A party wants to set aside a judgement under section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In which of the fol-lowing circumstances can he do so?
• According to section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the secondary evidence can be admitted in ____ exceptional cases.
• In which of the following cases did the court held that a party who produces witnesses in court produces them as witnesses of truth; and simply because portions of their statements are not favourable to the party producing them, they cannot be condemned as biased witnesses?
• During the cross examination of the witness as to previ-ous statements made before the police almost all con-tradictions or omissions were brought on record, which were portions from the statements made before the police that were not deposed before the court. Which of the following statements will apply to the case?