Q.

Secondary evidence is admissible:

A. where the non-production of primary evidence has not been accounted for
B. where the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for
C. irrespective of whether the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for or not
D. both (a) & (c) are correct.
Answer» B. where the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for
1.6k
0
Do you find this helpful?
3

View all MCQs in

Indian Evidence Act

Discussion

No comments yet