McqMate

Q. |
## You trained a binary classifier model which gives very high accuracy on the training data, but much lower accuracy on validation data. Which is false. |

A. | this is an instance of overfitting |

B. | this is an instance of underfitting |

C. | the training was not well regularized |

D. | the training and testing examples are sampled from different distributions |

Answer» B. this is an instance of underfitting |

1.5k

0

Do you find this helpful?

3

View all MCQs in

Machine Learning (ML)No comments yet

- Suppose on performing reduced error pruning, we collapsed a node and observed an improvement in the prediction accuracy on the validation set. Which among the following statements are possible in light of the performance improvement observed? (a) The collapsed node helped overcome the effect of one or more noise affected data points in the training set (b) The validation set had one or more noise affected data points in the region corresponding to the collapsed node (c) The validation set did not have any data points along at least one of the collapsed branches (d) The validation set did have data points adversely affected by the collapsed node
- A company has build a kNN classifier that gets 100% accuracy on training data. When they deployed this model on client side it has been found that the model is not at all accurate. Which of the following thing might gone wrong? Note: Model has successfully deployed and no technical issues are found at client side except the model performance
- Imagine, you are solving a classification problems with highly imbalanced class. The majority class is observed 99% of times in the training data. Your model has 99% accuracy after taking the predictions on test data. Which of the following is true in such a case? 1. Accuracy metric is not a good idea for imbalanced class problems. 2.Accuracy metric is a good idea for imbalanced class problems. 3.Precision and recall metrics are good for imbalanced class problems. 4.Precision and recall metrics aren’t good for imbalanced class problems.
- Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it�s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very small C (C~0)?
- Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it�s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very large value of C(C->infinity)?
- Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it’s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very small C (C~0)?
- Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it’s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very large value of C(C->infinity)?
- Assume that you are given a data set and a neural network model trained on the data set. You are asked to build a decision tree model with the sole purpose of understanding/interpreting the built neural network model. In such a scenario, which among the following measures would you concentrate most on optimising?
- What is/are true about ridge regression? 1. When lambda is 0, model works like linear regression model 2. When lambda is 0, model doesn't work like linear regression model 3. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very small coefficients approaching 0 4. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very large coefficients approaching infinity
- What is/are true about ridge regression? 1. When lambda is 0, model works like linear regression model 2. When lambda is 0, model doesn’t work like linear regression model 3. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very small coefficients approaching 0 4. When lambda goes to infinity, we get very, very large coefficients approaching infinity