Suppose you are using a Linear SVM classifier with 2 class classification

Related MCQs

• Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting. Which of the following is best option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?
• Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting.Which of the following option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?
• Suppose you have trained an SVM with linear decision boundary after training SVM, you correctly infer that your SVM model is under fitting.Which of the following option would you more likely to consider iterating SVM next time?
• Suppose you are using a Linear SVM classifier with 2 class classification problem. Now you have been given the following data in which some points are circled red that are representing support vectors.If you remove the following any one red points from the data. Does the decision boundary will change?
• Suppose you are using a Linear SVM classifier with 2 class classification problem. Now you have been given the following data in which some points are circled red that are representing support vectors.If you remove the following any one red points from the data. Does the decision boundary will change?
• Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it�s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very small C (C~0)?
• Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it�s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very large value of C(C->infinity)?
• Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it’s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very small C (C~0)?
• Suppose you are building a SVM model on data X. The data X can be error prone which means that you should not trust any specific data point too much. Now think that you want to build a SVM model which has quadratic kernel function of polynomial degree 2 that uses Slack variable C as one of it’s hyper parameter.What would happen when you use very large value of C(C->infinity)?
• Imagine, you are solving a classification problems with highly imbalanced class. The majority class is observed 99% of times in the training data. Your model has 99% accuracy after taking the predictions on test data. Which of the following is true in such a case? 1. Accuracy metric is not a good idea for imbalanced class problems. 2.Accuracy metric is a good idea for imbalanced class problems. 3.Precision and recall metrics are good for imbalanced class problems. 4.Precision and recall metrics aren’t good for imbalanced class problems.