Who defined structuralism as "a method and not a doctrine"?

Related MCQs

• Structuralism originated in the structural linguistics of ………….
• Who defined history as an "unending dialogue between the present and the past."
• ……………..defined history as the presentation, in chronological order of successive developments in the means and relations of production.
• ……………., the famous Greek philosopher defined “History as the account of the unchanging past”
• The Renaissance scholar …………defined “History as a discipline that makes men wise”
• “The facts are really not at all like fish on the fishmonger's slab. They are like fish swimming about in a vast and sometimes inaccessible ocean; and what the historian catches will depend partly on chance, but mainly on what part of the ocean he chooses to fish in and what tackle he chooses to use – these two factors being, of course, determined by the kind of fish he wants to catch. By and large, the historian will get the kind of facts he wants”.who said
• "To each eye, perhaps, the outlines of a great civilization present a different picture. In the wide ocean upon which we venture, the possible ways and directions are many; and the same studies which have served for my work might easily, in other hands, not only receive a wholly different treatment and application, but lead to essentially different conclusions." Who said?
• …………. is an element of historical method, attempted to fill the gaps which a historian finds in his collected materials for the reconstruction of history.
• "The study of history is the best medicine for a sick mind; for in history you have a record of the infinite variety of human experience plainly set out for all to see; and in that record you can find yourself and your country both examples and warnings; fine things to take as models, base things rotten through and through, to avoid."
• "History is for human self-knowledge. Knowing yourself means knowing, first, what it is to be a person; secondly, knowing what it is to be the kind of person you are; and thirdly, knowing what it is to be the person you are and nobody else is. Knowing yourself means knowing what you can do; and since nobody knows what they can do until they try, the only clue to what man can do is what man has done. The value of history, then, is that it teaches us what man has done and thus what man is."