[Solved] Why to prefer red-black trees over AVL trees?

McqMate

Q.	Why to prefer red-black trees over AVL trees?
A.	Because red-black is more rigidly balanced
B.	AVL tree store balance factor in every node which costs space
C.	AVL tree fails at scale
D.	Red black is more efficient
Answer» B. AVL tree store balance factor in every node which costs space

1.6k

0

Do you find this helpful?

3

View all MCQs in

Data Structures (DS)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Given an empty AVL tree, how would you construct AVL tree when a set of numbers are given without performing any rotations?
An AVL tree is a self – balancing binary search tree, in which the heights of the two child sub trees of any node differ by
trees are B-trees of order 4. They are an isometric of trees.
What is an AVL tree?
What is the maximum height of an AVL tree with p nodes?
What maximum difference in heights between the leafs of a AVL tree is possible?
If binary trees are represented in arrays, what formula can be used to locate a left child, if the node has an index i?
What is the possible number of binary trees that can be created with 3 nodes, giving the sequence N, M, L when traversed in post-order.
Which of the following is not an advantage of trees?
Which of the following is incorrect with respect to binary trees?