[Solved] A an officer was ordered to arrest B, believing Z to be B, he arrest Z.

Q.	A an officer was ordered to arrest B, believing Z to be B, he arrest Z.
A.	A has committed no offence.
B.	A has committed an offence.
C.	A has committed no offence by reason of mistake of fact under Sec. 76.
D.	None of the above.
Answer» C. A has committed no offence by reason of mistake of fact under Sec. 76.

786

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A an officer of a Court is ordered by the Court to affect the arrest of P. But believing Q to be P. He arrests Q A is guilty of:
A attacked with sword B who was behind the bush believing B to be a tiger :
Give best response. A voted before he has attained the age of majority prescribed for exercising the right of franchise, believing that he was of age. Here:
X with the intention of causing Z’s death gave him a severe blow on his head. Z became unconscious. X believing Z to be dead and with a view to fabricate the evidence, throws X into a pond. It was found that Z died because of drowning. X is guilty of:
Give correct response. A administers to B a drug in order to procure abortion believing her to be pregnant but in fact she is not pregnant, Held that :
A in good faith, believing property belonging to Z to be his own property. takes that property out of B’s possession
X with the intention of causing Z’s death gave him a severe blow on his head. Z became unconscious. X believing Z to be dead and with a view to fabricate the evidence throws him (Z) into a pond. It was found that Z died because of drowning X is guilty of
A, intending to cause theft instigates B, to take property belonging to Z out of Z’s possession. A induces B to believe that the property belongs to A. B takes the property out of Z’s possession in good faith, believing it to be A’s property. With reference to the above statement Assertion (A): A is guilty of abetment of theft even if B is innocent. Reason (R): Liability of abettor is not dependent on the liability of the principal accused. Directions:- the following item consist of two statements, one labeled as Assertion A and the other labeled as Reason R. You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion A and the Reason R are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answers to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
A soldier beats an innocent person by the order of his superior officer :
A police officer without any search warrant enters a house in search of stolen property in good faith. The owner obstructed and resisted the entrance: