[Solved] Give correct response. Section 83 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the defence of infancy. It provides that :

Q.	Give correct response. Section 83 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the defence of infancy. It provides that :
A.	A child who is above 7 but below 12 years of age is deemed to be doli capax and he would not
B.	A child who is above 7 but below 12 years of age is deemed to be doli incapax, therefore, he would be liable if it be proved that he was doli capax.
C.	Section 83 is based on the principle of presumption of innocence of the accused unless the prosecution proves otherwise.
D.	In order to avail the defence under section 83 it must be shown that the child was above 7 but below 12 years of age and if that much is proved the burden shall then lie upon the prosecution to prove that he was capable of knowing the nature and quality of his act.
Answer» A. A child who is above 7 but below 12 years of age is deemed to be doli capax and he would not

2.7k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Assertion (A): X, because of unsoundness of mind, not knowing the nature of the act attacks Y, who in self-defence and in order to ward of the attack, hits him thereby causing him hurt. Y does not commit an offence. Reason (R): Y had a right of private defence against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code. Of the above statements.
Give incorrect response. The following are essentials of defence of mistake of fact under section 76 of the Penal Code:
Point out incorrect response. The exercise of the right of private defence under the Penal Code is subject to the following limitations as contained in section 99 of the code :
Point out incorrect response. The following are ingredients of the defence of necessity under section 81 of the Penal Code :
Give correct response. Common intention within the meaning of section 34 of the Penal Code means:
Give correct response. The principle of common intention within the meaning of section 34 of the Penal Code means:
Give correct response. A was charged with the murder of his wife, takes the defence of insanity and in the alternative of being drunk at the time of commission of the crime and being thus incapable of forming the intent required in murder. It is also pleaded in defence that the accused was a psychopath. The evidence further discloses that the accused had indicated an intention to kill his wife before taking alcohol. Here :
Consider the following statements: To justify as a defence to a charge of crime: 1. Irresistible impulse per se is no defence to a charge of crime. 2. Diminished responsibility is a defence to a charge of a crime. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Give incorrect response. The following are the requirements of the principle of joint liability under section 34 of the Penal Code:
Point out incorrect response. The following are ingredients of section 79 of the Indian Penal Code: