Give incorrect response. The following are the requirements of the principle of joint liability under section 34 of the Penal Code:

Related MCQs

• Give incorrect response. The following are essentials of defence of mistake of fact under section 76 of the Penal Code:
• Point out incorrect response. The exercise of the right of private defence under the Penal Code is subject to the following limitations as contained in section 99 of the code :
• Consider the following two statements, one labeled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R): Assertion (A): There is no liability for an attempt to commit an impossible theft. Reason (R): No criminal liability can be incurred under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code for an attempt to do an act which, if done will not be an offence. Of the above statements.
• Assertion (A): There is no liability for an attempt to commit an impossible theft. Reason (R): No criminal liability can be incurred under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code for an attempt to do an act which, if done, will not be an offence.
• Give correct response. The principle of common intention within the meaning of section 34 of the Penal Code means:
• Point out incorrect response. The following are ingredients of the defence of necessity under section 81 of the Penal Code :
• Point out incorrect response. The following are ingredients of section 79 of the Indian Penal Code:
• Give correct response. Common intention within the meaning of section 34 of the Penal Code means:
• Give correct response. Section 83 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the defence of infancy. It provides that :
• Assertion (A): The Indian Penal code contains certain exceptions from criminal liability. Reason (R): There cannot be universal criminal liability in all circumstances. Of the above statements.