Which one of the following conclusion can be drawn from de minimis non curat tax?

Related MCQs

• Which one of the following conclusions can be drawn from de minimus no curat tax?
• The maxim ‘de minimus non curat lex’ means:
• The principle ‘de minimus non curat lex’ is contained in:
• A signs his own name to a bill of exchange, intending that it may be believed that the bill was drawn by another person of the same name. A
• If Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea is a cardinal principal of criminal law, then which one of the following statements correctly reflects the above principle?
• A quarrel arose between C on the one side and A and B on the other. C abused A, whereupon A struck him with a stick, and B struck him down with an axe on the head. He also received two other wounds with the axe on the other parts of the body. Any one of the three axe wounds was sufficient enough to cause death, especially the one on the head.
• Under Article 32 a writ petition can be made to the Supreme Court by a person who himself has suffered only. Under which of the following, a relative or friend of a person aggrieved can file a writ petition:
• A is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention. Under which one of the following situations can his offence be proved?
• Consider the following two statements, one labeled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R): Assertion (A): There is no liability for an attempt to commit an impossible theft. Reason (R): No criminal liability can be incurred under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code for an attempt to do an act which, if done will not be an offence. Of the above statements.
• A surgeon knowing fully well that except a miracle, nothing can save X, who is ailing from a disease. In good faith, if the surgeon operated on X, but a consequence of that operation X died, then which one of the following would be correct?