[Solved] Which one of the following correctly brings out the main distinction between Common Intention and Common Object?

Q.	Which one of the following correctly brings out the main distinction between Common Intention and Common Object?
A.	Common intention creates specific offence whereas common object does not
B.	Common intention as well as common object create specific offences
C.	Common object creates specific offence whereas common intention does not
D.	Both common objects as well as common intention do not create specific offence.
Answer» C. Common object creates specific offence whereas common intention does not

3.8k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Which one of the following brings out the distinction between Section 34 and 149 of the IPC?
Which one of the following brings out the distinction between Section 34 and 149 of the IPC?
Which one of the following is associated with Common Intention?
A is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention. Under which one of the following situations can his offence be proved?
Which one of the following is associated with Common intention?
Assertion (A): Where sister of X was being abducted by force from her parents house by her husband, X caused death of sister’s husband in defence of the sister against an assault with intention of abducting her by force, it was held that the private defence of body extended in the above circumstances to the causing of death. Reason (R): The word abducting in Section 100 IPC includes abduction simpliciter. Direction: The following four items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion (A) and the Reason (R) are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answer to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each one of them is liable:
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all each one of them is liable:
Point out incorrect response. There is a presumption that mens rea and evil intention or knowledge of the wrongfulness of the act, is an essential in every offence. However, the following are some of the exceptions to this general rule:
Assertion (A): X and Y had independently entertained the idea to kill Z. Accordingly each of them separately inflicted wounds on Z, who dies in consequence. X and Y are liable for murder with the aid of Section 34 IPC. Reason (R): When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each of such persons is liable as if the whole act is done by him alone. Of the above statements.