S sells certain goods to B of Bombay. The goods are handed over to the railways for transmission to B. In the mean time B sells the goods to a third party T for consideration without the consent of S. B. becomes insolvent. In this case —

Related MCQs

• Where there is an agreement to sell goods on the price fixed by a third party on valuation, but the third party refuses to do so, and the buyer appropriates part of the goods delivered to him.
• If a contract of sale stipulates that price will be fixed by a third party on valuation of the goods, and the third party shows inability to do so, then,
• In Indian Law consideration must have been done at the desire of the promisor, if it is done at the instance of a third party or without the desire of the promisor, it is
• When the consent of a party to the contract has been obtained by fraud, in such a case the contract is:
• When a person, who is in dominating position, obtains the consent of the other by exercising his influence on the other, the consent is said to be obtained by:
• While obtaining the consent of the promisee, keeping silence by the promisor when he has a duty to speak about the material facts, amounts to consent obtained by:
• Where by the contract, a promisor is to perform his promise without application by the promise and no time for performance is specified the engagement must be performed within a reasonable time. The question "What is a reason able time" is in each particular case is a :
• An agreement without consideration is void except in case of compensation for
• Where the Unpaid Seller has parted with the goods by handing it over to a carrier for transmission, and the goods are in transit, he can reclaim possession thereof. This right is called —
• A minor enters into agreement representing himself to be a major consider the following statement: 1. Minor commits fraud if the other party does not have personal knowledge of his age 2. Such agreement is not enforceable 3. The doctrine of estoppel does not apply in minor's case 4. Other party is entitled to get back the benefit passed to minor, if innocent about his age Which of the statements given above are correct?