In the context of India's Five Year Plans, a shift in the pattern of industrialization, with lower emphasis on heavy industries and more on infrastructure begins in [IAS 2010]

Related MCQs

• Put in chronological order the following Special features/objectives of different Five Year Plans as they were first formulated: 1. Mahalanobis strategy 2. Modernisation 3. Removal of Poverty 4. Emphasis on employment generation
• Which one of the following Five-Year Plans recognised human development as the core of all developmental efforts? [IAS 1995]
• In the context of Indian economy, consider the following pairs: Term Most appropriate description 1. Melt down Fall in stock prices 2. Recession Fall in growth rate 3. Slow down Fall in GDP Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched? [IAS 2010]
• With reference to BRIC countries, consider the following statements: 1. At present, China's GDP is more than the combined GDP of all the three other countries. 2. China's population is more than the combined population of any two other countries. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? [IAS 2010]
• In India, the tax proceeds of which one of the following as a percentage of gross tax revenue has significantly declined in the last five years? [IAS 2010]
• In the context of Indian economy, consider the following statements: 1. The growth rate of GDP has – steadily increased in the last five years. 2. The growth rate in per capita income has steadily increased in the last five years. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? [CSAT2011]
• For internal financing of Five Year Plans, the government depends on: [NDA 1991]
• The Five Year Plans of India intend to develop the country industrially through: [NDA 1991]
• The concept of Five Year Plans in India was introduced by
• Which of the following are not correct assessments of the decades of India's Five-Year Plans? 1. There has been very low capital formation 2. Growth has favoured the better off 3. Production has increased substantially though often falling short of targets 4. The public sector has contributed nothing to economic growth