‘Sedition’ as offence was held constitutionally valid in Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SC 955 us dealt under-

Related MCQs

• Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment, if offence be committed if the offence be not committed is dealt under-
• Abetment of any offence, punishable with death or imprisonment for life, if the offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment is dealt under-
• Section 34 of I.P.C. provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations: 1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A’s house. 2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang. 3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence. 4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale). Which of the situation given above reflect (s) the correct ingredients with regard of Section 34?
• When a member of an unlawful assembly is to be constructively found guilty of an offence, he must commit same offence of which the principle is convicted and not some other offence this statement is --
• Which one of the following is sufficient to prove the offence of sedition?
• Which one of the following conditions if present would constitute the offence of sedition?
• A person who commits an offence in a state of voluntary intoxication shall be liable to be dealt with as if he had:
• In cases where an act is not an offence unless done with particular knowledge and intents a person who does the act in state of intoxication shall be liable to the be dealt as if he :
• Abetment of any offence, if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment is dealt under-
• Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-