Which of the following is not correct in connection with the requisites of rescission?

Related MCQs

• Nik sold to Paul a real property payable in monthly installments within a 5 year period, Paul was only able to pay 14 monthly installments, after the 60 day grace period and after 30 days of Paul’s receipt of the notice and letter calling for the rescission of the contract Nik rescinded the same. Paul contended that there was an automatic rescission done by Nik, hence, the same was void. Give the best answer.
• If an injured party in a contract has demanded rescission, he later may ask for performance. However, of he seeks performance, he can no longer seek for rescission of the contract.
• Action for rescission on the account of lesion will prescribe within ---
• If the seller cancels the contract to sell under the Maceda Law, when will it take effect after receipt of notice of cancellation or demand for rescission by notarial act?
• The following are the requisites of the easement of right of way, except.
• An action pauliana is an action to rescind contracts in fraud of creditors. The following are its requisites, except:
• In connection with the rule of mutual agency of the partners in a partnership which of the following is not correct?
• The following are correct in connection with contracts of adhesion, except:
• A is the owner of a parcel of land adjoining B’s lot. B, knowing that the lot did not belong to him constructed his house on the lot belonging to A. Which of the following is the not correct?
• Samson, the son of a wealthy family has always claimed that since childhood, he was not a boy. He played with the girls and did not mingle with the boys. After finishing his course at a university in the Philippines, he went to the US to take up his masteral and doctorate degrees. He consulted several doctors of the possibility of sex transmission from that of male to that of a female. The sex transmission was done in Thailand and which was certified as successful by a medical expert in Manila, hence, he claimed to be a woman. He filed a petition for correction of entry of his record of birth from male to female and his name from Samson to Delailah as he was marrying his fiancé. The lower court granted the petition. Is the order of the court correct?