Q.

Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched?

A. ADM Jabalpur case-Rights of citizens under emergency
B. Indira Sawhney case-Rights of women at work
C. Vishakha case-Centre-State relations
D. Kartar Singh case-Rights of minorities
Answer» A. ADM Jabalpur case-Rights of citizens under emergency
Explanation: Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees right to the life and liberty. However, during internal emergency (1975-77), the Right to move to the court to enforce Article 21 was suspended under Article 359 of the Constitution. Soon a question arose if, in such a situation, a writ of Habeas Corpus was maintainable? ADM Jabalpur Vs Shiv Kant Shukla AIR 1976, also known as the Habeas Corpus case, dealt with this question.
2.1k
0
Do you find this helpful?
3

View all MCQs in

Indian Polity and Constitution (GK)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs