Proviso 1 to Section 33, Indian Evidence Act, not only covers cases of privity in estate and succession of title, but also cases where which of the following condition is met?

Related MCQs

• Under proviso 4 to section 92 of Evidence Act, oral evidence is admissible in cases
• An estate called “the Rampur Tea Estate” is sold by a deed which contains a map of the property sold. Applying Section 92, Indian Evidence Act:
• In which of the following cases the evidence given by the witness will NOT be relevant under section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
• The want or failure of consideration as contemplated under proviso 1 to section 92 of Evidence Act invalidating a document
• Mistake referred to in proviso 1 to section 92 of Evidence Act refers to
• In criminal cases under Section 54, Indian Evidence Act to prove that the defendant committed the crime charged, evidence may not be given that he:
• According to section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the secondary evidence can be admitted in ____ exceptional cases.
• Which of the following section of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to interrogations by a Customs Officer exercising power under Section 171 -A of the Sea Customs Act?
• Section 65, Indian Evidence Act with which of the fol-lowing situation under which secondary evidence can be given?
• Accused wants to submit a document for consideration under section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In which of the following cases will the document become irrelevant?