[Solved] The difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code:

Q.	The difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code:
A.	That whereas in Section 34 there must at least be five persons, Section 149 requires only two persons
B.	That Section 149 is only a rule of evidence whereas Section 34 creates a specific offence and provides for its punishment.
C.	That Section 34 requires active participation in action whereas Section 149 requires mere passive membership of the unlawful assembly
D.	That Section 34 need not be joined with the principle offence, whereas Section 149 must be combined with the principle offence.
Answer» C. That Section 34 requires active participation in action whereas Section 149 requires mere passive membership of the unlawful assembly

4.3k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860)

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Which one of the following statements regarding Section 34 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code is correct?
The difference between Section 34 and Section 149 is:
Point out incorrect response. The exercise of the right of private defence under the Penal Code is subject to the following limitations as contained in section 99 of the code :
Assertion (A): X and Y independently intending to kill Z strike him with iron rod on his head. Z dies as a result of the injuries. Both X and Y are guilty of murder under Section 302/304, Indian Penal Code. Reason (R): When a criminal act is done by several person in furtherance of common intention of all, each of them is liable as if it was done by him alone.Of the above statements.
What is the difference between Sc. 34 and 149?
Assertion (A): X, because of unsoundness of mind, not knowing the nature of the act attacks Y, who in self-defence and in order to ward of the attack, hits him thereby causing him hurt. Y does not commit an offence. Reason (R): Y had a right of private defence against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code. Of the above statements.
Consider the following two statements, one labeled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R): Assertion (A): There is no liability for an attempt to commit an impossible theft. Reason (R): No criminal liability can be incurred under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code for an attempt to do an act which, if done will not be an offence. Of the above statements.
The expression ‘harm’ is used in Section 81 of the Indian Penal Code in the sense of:
Point out incorrect response. The following are ingredients of section 79 of the Indian Penal Code:
Give correct response. Section 83 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the defence of infancy. It provides that :