A man in order to escape death from hunger kills another for the purpose of eating :

Related MCQs

• X while in the state of voluntary intoxication kills Z. prosecution fails to establish that X could form an intention of a sober man. X is guilty of:
• A is at work with a hatchet: the head flies off and kills a man who is standing by. What offence is committed by A in this situation?
• X while in the state of voluntary intoxication, kills Z. Prosecution fails to establish that X cloud form an intention of a sober man, X is guilty of
• If death of a major person is caused with his consent, suffers death or takes the risk of death with his known consent:
• Assertion (A): A person compelled by threats, from another, which reasonably cause apprehension of his instant death, commits murder of the third person, can plead the defence of compulsion. Reason (R): Consent of the deceased (above 12 years) is a defence to the charge of murder if the act causing death is done in good fait for the benefit of the deceased without intention to kill. Of the above statements.
• X having sufficient food does not provide some food to a beggar who dies of hunger. X is guilty of:
• X having sufficient food does not provide some food to a beggar who dies of hunger. X is guilty of
• Give correct response. A, a surgeon knowing that a particular operation is likely to cause the death of Z, who suffers under the painful complaint but not intending to cause Z’s death and intending in good faith Z’s benefit performs that operation on Z with Z’s Consent :
• Give best response. A entered the house of B at the dead of night with the intention of committing theft. B struck him with a lathi in the dark and A fell down unconscious. B gave him one more blow which fell on A’s head, causing extensive bleeding and A’s death. B is prosecuted for murder and takes the plea that the death was caused in exercise of the right of private defence of property. Here :
• T instigates C, a child under seven years of age to do an act which can cause X’s death. In consequence of this C cause X’s death in absence of T. With reference to the above statement” Assertion (A): T is liable for murder of X, even though the actual act has been committed by an infant. Reason (R): The liability of the abettor depends upon the capability and knowledge or intention of the person abetted. Of the above statements.