Point out incorrect response. The following are the examples of cases of strict liability at common law:

Related MCQs

• Give best response. The liability to conviction of an individual depends not only on his having done some outward acts which the law forbids but on his having done them in a certain frame of mind or with a certain will. Exceptions to this general rule are strict liability offences which mean that:
• Point out incorrect response. The following cases are covered by the exception from criminal liability as contained in section 89 I.P.C. :
• Point out incorrect response. Indian law relating to drunkenness as defence may be summed up in the following propositions :
• Point out incorrect response. Common object within the meaning of Section 149 means :
• Point out incorrect response. An assembly of five or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly” if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is :
• Point out incorrect response. Actus reus and mens rea are the two important elements of a crime. Actus reus may be defined as ‘such result of human conduct as the law seeks to prevent.’ It is made up of three constituent parts, namely :
• A, intending to cause theft instigates B, to take property belonging to Z out of Z’s possession. A induces B to believe that the property belongs to A. B takes the property out of Z’s possession in good faith, believing it to be A’s property. With reference to the above statement Assertion (A): A is guilty of abetment of theft even if B is innocent. Reason (R): Liability of abettor is not dependent on the liability of the principal accused. Directions:- the following item consist of two statements, one labeled as Assertion A and the other labeled as Reason R. You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion A and the Reason R are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answers to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
• Give incorrect response. The following are the requirements of the principle of joint liability under section 34 of the Penal Code:
• Give incorrect response. The following are the essential conditions of criminal liability.
• Give incorrect response. The defence of necessity will be available in the following cases :