[Solved] The owner and the tenant are in both possession of the land subject of the lease contract.

Q.	The owner and the tenant are in both possession of the land subject of the lease contract.
A.	No, only the tenant, because he is in actual possession of the land.
B.	No, only the owner, because the other is just a mere tenant.
C.	Yes, but of different concept.
D.	No, either of them.
Answer» D. No, either of them.

3.4k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A contract of lease was entered into between A & B with a provision that it is for a period of 5 years renewable for another 5 years. The contract expired on June 30, 2010 but up to now, the lessee is still in possession of the premises. What does the implicit renewal of the contract mean?
Mr. Ayco offered to sell his land to Mr. Cruz for P300,000. Mr. Cruz accepted the offer and paid Mr. Ayco the purchase price. Mr. Ayco delivered the owner’s duplicate of the Transfer Certificate of title of the land. Mr. Cruz wants to register the land in his name but the Register of Deeds asks Mr. Cruz for the Deed of Sale. What can Mr. Cruz do?
Magdalene and Shantung Company entered into a contract of agency before the consul general of the Philippines in Singapore. They stipulated that Magdalene shall be the administrator of the real properties of Shantung Company in the said country. By virtue of the said contract, Magdalene sold the 1 hectare land of Shantung Company located in Singapore to Mayhem Real Estate Corporation without any special power of attorney. The said contract of sale was executed before the vice consul of the Philippines in Singapore. Under the laws of Singapore, the sale of a real property by an agent without a special power of attorney is valid. Shantung Company filed a suit for the annulment of the contract of sale on the ground that Magdalene has no authority to sell the property. If you were the judge, which of the following courses of action should you take?
A & B entered into a contract of lease over A’s house and lot. Without the consent of A, B assigned the lease to C. Is the assignment valid?
A is the owner of a parcel of land adjoining a river. There is an accretion formed through the natural current of the river. In 1980, his neighbor took possession of the accretion. In 2011, B filed an application for registration. Will the petition prosper?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1 consisting of 10,000 square meters more of less adjoining the river bank. Accretion was formed which has been in the possession of B in 1990, but it was disposed of by the Director of Lands to B in s2010. Is the Director correct?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
A and B are married. They have been in possession of an agricultural land of the public domain as early as 1935. After their death C and D, their heirs inherited the same. Can they register the land?
In the contract of usufruct, the owner of the property is being called the naked owner. Why?
A sold a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 9 to B. At the time of the sale, B knew that C has been in possession of the parcel of land as early as 10 years before the sale. B however checked with the Registry of Deeds and found the title to be clean. Is B a buyer in good faith?