[Solved] A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1 consisting of 10,000 square meters more of less adjoining the river bank. Accretion was formed which has been in the possession of B in 1990, but it was disposed of by the Director of Lands to B in s2010. Is the Director correct?

Q.	A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1 consisting of 10,000 square meters more of less adjoining the river bank. Accretion was formed which has been in the possession of B in 1990, but it was disposed of by the Director of Lands to B in s2010. Is the Director correct?
A.	Yes, because the accretion forms part of the alienable land of the public domain;
B.	Yes, because of the Regalian Doctrine;
C.	No, because it belongs to A, being the riparian owner, hence, a private land;
D.	Yes, because of prescription.
Answer» C. No, because it belongs to A, being the riparian owner, hence, a private land;

1.9k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A is the owner of a parcel of land adjoining a river. There is an accretion formed through the natural current of the river. In 1980, his neighbor took possession of the accretion. In 2011, B filed an application for registration. Will the petition prosper?
A sold a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 9 to B. At the time of the sale, B knew that C has been in possession of the parcel of land as early as 10 years before the sale. B however checked with the Registry of Deeds and found the title to be clean. Is B a buyer in good faith?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 123 located in a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. He did not know the exact location of the lot, hence, he consulted the developer who pointed to a lot, hence, he constructed his house. It turned out that it was another lot covered by TCT No. 124. Is A a builder in good faith?
X and Y entered into a contract of sale over a parcel of land with an area of 4,000 square meters more or less. When the title was issued, it was 14,475 sq. meters. The buyer contended that he owned the whole lot of 14,475 sq. meters as it was sold in lump sum, hence, the seller should deliver the whole lot. Is the buyer correct?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by a TCT No. 1. B stole the title, forged his signature and transferred it under his name. TCT No. 2 was issued under his name. He sold it to C who registered under his name. When returned to the Philippine in 2010, he discovered that his title was transferred to another. Can he recover the same?
A owns a parcel of land. Through the natural current of the river, there was a gradual increase in the area from 11,000 square meters to 13,000 square meters in a period of 8 years. Can A register the land?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
A is the owner of a property covered by TCT No. 10. As early as 1950, he knew that his title has been transferred under the name of B, but did nothing to recover it, knowing that B has been in possession. Can he file an action to recover it today?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. He leased it to B. When sued for ejectment, B contended that A’s title is void. Is he correct?
The northeastern portion of the land of X is bounded by the Manila bay. If there is accretion formed, who owns the accretion? Choose the best answer.